Usability

Come discuss, create and plan great Drupal UX design in here!

Other places to explore: Core issues tagged 'usability', Where UI docs live, Come chat in IRC in #drupal-usability.

Process for working on the big UX issues

This diagram summarizes the process we agreed on during our meeting (log)

earnie's picture

Email notice for Closed Discussion

The email notification links for a closed discussion should not contain the link for the Post Reply since none can be added. This is confusing to any user but particularly someone new. Maybe the text should read "Post reply: Closed discussion".

yoroy's picture

D7 UX improvements IRC meeting

Start: 
2008-09-16 20:15 - 21:30 Europe/Amsterdam

Let's organize ourselves and get more people involved with improving the D7 User Experience


Agenda:
- Nail down the top 10 of issues we want to work on.
- How to work on each issue: figure out the process.
- Who does what? Assign tasks within ux-team.
- Get started!


We'll meet in #drupal-usability

Hope to see you there.

Roy

EclipseGc's picture

Update Status Page

OK, so I've spent a bit of time rethinking the update status page... I think it's time for some feed back.

I've broken it into 4 areas: Critical Updates, Available Updates, New Versions, and Up To Date.

Critical Updates are those which need updating right now.
Available Updates are those for which an update exists but is not mandatory.
New Versions would be like an upgrade from imagecache to imagecache 2.
And Up To Date is obvious.

I don't have core showing on here, but it would appear in the category that applies to it (only ever Critical, New Version or Up To Date).

Read more
Ambrose's picture

DRAIP - an old idea renewed

DRAIP: Drupal Remote Administration Interface Protocol

"Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain, err drape, err draip!"
--- with appologies to L. Frank Baum :)

Read more
eigentor's picture

IRC Meeting: Work Organization Strategy

How about an IRC Meeting. I'd suggest the following date:
Tuesday, 23rd Sept. 20.00 CEST

And how about concentrating on Guidelines for our work organization.

There are some instant suggestions that come to my mind, which I'd like to propose, so maybe (maybe!) we come out with recommendations to everyone that proposes a task / an improvement:

<

ul>

  • Form a small team and claim the task (1 Person can be a team, better two, still better mixed dev/ux)
  • Do user testing / collect user feedback from the very first draft
  • Read more
    Shannon Lucas's picture

    Drupal Human Interface Guidelines (HIG)

    Update: This effort is now combined with the User Interface best practices wiki.

    Read more
    webchick's picture

    Workflow for engaging designers/themers in core patch reviews?

    At Drupalcon Szeged, I had some discussions with the documentation team and the usability team regarding workflow for getting their feedback injected early into the core development process. I'd like to start a similar discussion here with you folks.

    Drupal 7 with its code freeze date of "When it's ready" represents a great opportunity for us all to collectively "kick it up a notch." Key to this is involving many more people in the core development process than we normally have. There are always several relatively minor core patches that affect themers in the queue at any given time, such as add $node_classes to node templates, as well as huge, over-arching efforts such as administration theme in core.
    But unfortunately, a lot of these patches stagnate and die, because designers have not traditionally been a group of people that we've served particularly well. I'd like to see that changed.

    Read more

    Those little annoying UI things

    Share your favourite Drupal User Interface gripe. Big or small.

    The buttons and tabs in the sequence of screens when "requesting a new password" have labels that don't reflect what the buttons actually do, and the instructions are incomplete and misleading. Novice Members, especially those who don't have much computer savvy, can be severely flummoxed throughout this process.

    • The "Request new password" tab should say something like "Forgot my password." (The "Member" isn't actually going to be given a new password, he/she must eventually change their own password. This is NEVER made clear.)
    • The instructions on the following screen should say "Enter your {name of site} Username if you know it. Otherwise, enter the e-mail address where you receive {name of site} 'mass e-mails.' If neither is successful, send an e-mail to webmaster with a brief explanation."
    • The "E-mail new password" button on this same screen should say "E-mail password reset instructions." (Again, this is actually what is going to happen. Nobody is emailing you a password.)
    • The default text in the email that's sent to the Member needs to say things like "the following link," not "this link," because there are several links in the text. Of course you can edit and improve the text, but the default needs to make more sense.
    • The instructions in this email should remind the Member that after clicking on the link, they will have only one opportunity to CHANGE THEIR OWN PASSWORD.
    • The screen that the Member sees when returned to the site by the email link needs clearer instructions. (Some of these Members have no idea where they are or what they're doing.) Suggested:

    One-time Login (title)

    To take advantage of this one-time account access, you must assign yourself a new password. If you log out before completing the steps below, you'll have to repeat the password-recovery procedure that brought you this far.

        *  Click on the link below to bring up the edit-password page.
        * Type your preferred password in the first password field.
        * Type it again in the second field to verify.
        *  Press the "Save" button at the bottom of the page.
    

    If you don't save your entry, the new password will not be registered in the system.

    • The button at the bottom of the page should say "Go to the Edit-Password Page," not "Log In." (The confused Member doesn't necessarily even know what Logging in is, much less that this instance is "abnormal."
    Read more

    Top 10 UX improvements for Drupal 7

    This is where we will sort out the Master List of ux-issues we want to improve on for Drupal 7.

    Read more
    Carlitus's picture

    UX-process: What goes where?

    edit: Carlitus, sorry to hijack your post, but this is an important discussion we'd like to get sorted quickly. Let's try and do this here. - yoroy

    The behaviour of the autocomplete when only one term (with one or more words) is needed its very odd: you need to hit the enter two times

    Example: the drupal API search

    I've found a very similar issue in 2007 http://drupal.org/node/171918

    Francewhoa's picture

    Dual Interface for Drupal 7 Administration Page

    About a dual interface for Drupal 7 administration page? I mean an admin interface that matches both new users’ needs and advance users' needs. Both win. I have posted info & examples here.

    Xano's picture

    Dynamic Help

    A few weeks ago Sutharsan (Erik Stielstra) proposed a kind of dynamic help for Header Image. Together with Bojhan Somers (Bojhan) we developed his idea into a usable way of creating lists with configuration steps for modules (or anything else you'd like to use it for). Last night I created Dynamic Help based on our efforts so far. It's not much code and one might have his doubts as to why I have put this in a separate module.

    Read more
    George2_'s picture

    Hardcoding of * for required field

    being unable to change the * easily for required fields makes your site 'look' like all the other drupal sites, and can pee you off if you don't want that! ie. if you want to change it to '(needed)', or whatever etc to suit your audience (older users of a site won't be trained to know what * means), so i think it should be translated to allow the drupal admin to get to it.

    Read more
    George2_'s picture

    preview on left, submit on right? who knows?

    in some places around drupal, ,the submit is on the left, and preview on the right, and are completely reversed in others. can this be standardised please.

    also, when the enter key is pressed, should the default action be to post, not preview. as enter is normally a substitute for pressing submit in most forms, why break it?

    pwolanin's picture

    Prevent users from navigating away from unsaved data?

    Please give you feedback on this proposed change:

    http://drupal.org/node/193799 => Warn before losing changes (e.g.: blocks and menu admin pages)

    George2_'s picture

    first time experiences & thoughts

    hi everyone, i wanted to post up some thoughts and ideas that i found confusing from when i first started with drupal. this is mostly based on 5 experiences. i know 6 has come a long way from 5, but i don't really have that much experience of 6 yet, so sorry if some of this doesn't apply. so, in no particular order

    Read more
    drumm's picture

    UX sprint group 4 (The long node/add form) progress

    bertboerland, ximo, al.ex, Jan K, and I tackled the node form. We have results from Minneapolis usability study for Drupal 6 and Baltimore study for vertical tabs.

    Read more
    kika's picture

    Working on new usability group layout and content

    One of the Szeged UX sprint task were improve the contents and layout of this group. With great help from Drumm and Moshe we managed to base our layout on panels (e.g. superb flexibility) and we are now free to come up with any type of flexible layout for our home.

    We are just starting and there are a lot of room for improvements. Please give feedback if this new layout breaks on your browser -- block droppage has been reported -- and what else should be done. Webchick dropped an idea what they are using over SoC: have a special "featured" or "important" tag on content so we could list/sticky important discussions / going-ons automatically.

    Also there are some confusion over content types we are using in this group: "Jobs" have not used once -- should we kill it? -- there are some confusion whenever one should create a wiki or discussion on particular issue, this needs clarification.

    In related note, Moshe enabled attachments on comments so we can start having a "Photoshop ping-pong" exchanging ideas visually, at least in theory. Does it make wiki pages obsolete? Discuss!

    Also, Niels is working on new and improved "quicklinks" panel what you can see in the right. We are about to get rid of outdated and depreciated links there and have logical chunks for the information. It's a wiki page so everybody is welcome to improve and update it later on.

    Subscribe with RSS Syndicate content

    Usability

    Group organizers

    Group categories

    UX topics

    Group events

    Add to calendar

    Group notifications

    This group offers an RSS feed. Or subscribe to these personalized, sitewide feeds:

    Hot content this week