[6:06pm] jhodgdon: GaborHojtsy: is the meeting now or did I get the time wrong again?
[6:06pm] vijaycs85 joined the chat room.
[6:06pm] GaborHojtsy: huh, yeah I was mistaken >D
[6:06pm] GaborHojtsy: so MEETING time :)
[6:06pm] GaborHojtsy: thanks jhodgdon
[6:06pm] GaborHojtsy: who is here?
[6:06pm] jhodgdon: jhodgdon is here obviously
[6:07pm] Kristen_Pol joined the chat room.
[6:07pm] GaborHojtsy: I recognize jhodgdon, penyaskito, plach, reyero, Schnitzel, sebcorbin, tstoeckler1, vijaycs85, webflo, Kristen_Pol: are you here?
[6:07pm] tstoeckler1 is now known as tstoeckler.
[6:07pm] tstoeckler: here
[6:07pm] Druplicon: tstoeckler: 6 days 17 hours ago <dawehner> tell tstoeckler Is there a reason why BaseFieldDefinition::createFromFieldStorageDefinition requires isRequired even that does not exist on FieldStorageDefinitionInterface?
[6:07pm] vijaycs85: GaborHojtsy: hey, I'm back :)
[6:08pm] plach: yup
[6:08pm] waako|zzz is now known as waako.
[6:08pm] nonsie joined the chat room.
[6:09pm] tstoeckler: dawehner: Oh wow, what a nice bug. OTOH FieldStorageDefinitionInterface *should* have isRequired() if I remember the consensus on https://drupal.org/node/2232477 correctly
[6:09pm] Druplicon: https://drupal.org/node/2232477 => Fatal when adding new fields with NOT NULL constraints in a base table that contains existing entities [#2232477] => 63 comments, 3 IRC mentions
[6:09pm] tstoeckler: ugh
[6:09pm] Kristen_Pol: am now… but have meeting in 22 minutes… nothing to report but will see what others have to say… btw, off topic, but my son had 8 baby teeth pulled yesterday… yikes
[6:09pm] GaborHojtsy: tstoeckler: jumped channel? :D
[6:09pm] tstoeckler: Druplicon: tell dawehner: Oh wow, what a nice bug. OTOH FieldStorageDefinitionInterface *should* have isRequired() if I remember the consensus on https://drupal.org/node/2232477 correctly
[6:09pm] Druplicon: https://drupal.org/node/2232477 => Fatal when adding new fields with NOT NULL constraints in a base table that contains existing entities [#2232477] => 63 comments, 4 IRC mentions
[6:09pm] Druplicon: tstoeckler: I'll pass that on when dawehner is around.
[6:10pm] attrib joined the chat room.
[6:10pm] GaborHojtsy: all right, welcome all!
[6:10pm] tstoeckler: GaborHojtsy: nope, I'm just i18n today. sorry for the disturbance
[6:10pm] GaborHojtsy: I don’t think I have special announcement this time :) as for my report I am working at pieceing away at https://www.drupal.org/node/2183983
[6:10pm] Druplicon: https://www.drupal.org/node/2183983 => Find hidden configuration schema issues [#2183983] => 142 comments, 21 IRC mentions
[6:10pm] reyero: hi
[6:10pm] Druplicon: Hi! Did you clear your cache?
[6:11pm] GaborHojtsy: Landed major fixes for test views, views wizards, etc.
[6:11pm] GaborHojtsy: currently working on more views things and some migration fails
[6:11pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran I think you are here to talk about these?
[6:12pm] GaborHojtsy: well, no >D
[6:12pm] GaborHojtsy: ok
[6:13pm] GaborHojtsy: jhodgdon: wanna go next?
[6:13pm] jhodgdon: GaborHojtsy: ok
[6:13pm] jhodgdon: I haven't actually been doing much with D8MI the past few weeks except contributing to the discussion/reviews on https://www.drupal.org/node/2342045
[6:13pm] Druplicon: https://www.drupal.org/node/2342045 => Formatter and language cannot be selected in views for base fields [#2342045] => 29 comments, 10 IRC mentions
[6:13pm] jhodgdon: This is a critical issue and really really needs to be fixed
[6:14pm] jhodgdon: if multilingual sites should be able to use Views it needs fixing that is.
[6:14pm] GaborHojtsy: so dawehner was doing some work on this one
[6:14pm] jhodgdon: yes
[6:15pm] GaborHojtsy: we had some brainstorming on that earlier this week with dawehner and yoroy but no great results
[6:15pm] jhodgdon: He started with the Node Title field, and his patch for that still needs work, as it lost the ability to link it to the node
[6:15pm] GaborHojtsy: we’ve been discussing possibly adding linking capability to “short value” fields if they are related to an entity
[6:15pm] GaborHojtsy: otherwise the fields explode to strings that may link to entities and strings that are not, etc.
[6:15pm] jhodgdon: anyway there is that issue and then if/when that gets fixed, https://www.drupal.org/node/2217569 and then I think multilingual views will actually be working pretty well
[6:15pm] Druplicon: https://www.drupal.org/node/2217569 => Fields row plugin: Translation is non-uniform for base fields, Field UI fields, links; no way to choose "this row's language" [#2217569] => 50 comments, 25 IRC mentions
[6:15pm] GaborHojtsy: I think that starts to be confusing fast
[6:16pm] jhodgdon: To me it makes sense that any field should be linkable to the entity ("short values" yes)
[6:16pm] jhodgdon: why not? :)
[6:17pm] jhodgdon: but making that happen is another problem, for instance, what language would the link be in? I'm not sure all that is working right.
[6:17pm] GaborHojtsy: jhodgdon: well, that would be the next layer of the problem yeah
[6:18pm] GaborHojtsy: jhodgdon: I hope if we don’t try to solve everything at once then we still have a chance to resolve things step by step
[6:18pm] Fengtan joined the chat room.
[6:18pm] GaborHojtsy: jhodgdon: hope to not try to design the whole solution at once IF we can get there in steps
[6:18pm] jhodgdon: anyway, we need to make sure that stays Critical... on another issue that's really a duplicate, https://www.drupal.org/node/2385443#comment-9397243 larowlan commented "... if that one gets demoted"
[6:18pm] Druplicon: https://www.drupal.org/node/2385443 => Base entity fields using 'standard' plugin added via EntityViewsData to not respect field level access [#2385443] => 14 comments, 3 IRC mentions
[6:18pm] jhodgdon: which I hope doesn't happen
[6:19pm] jhodgdon: and the patch on that other issue is a temporary solution IMO; would be better to focus effort on the real fix rather than on that one.
[6:19pm] GaborHojtsy: jhodgdon: agreed
[6:19pm] jhodgdon: the problem is that we can't really deploy a solution that takes away the ability to link node titles to the node, since that gets used in at least 50% of field-based node views, don't you think?
[6:20pm] jhodgdon: very common UI
[6:20pm] jhodgdon: anyway... that's all on my D8MI radar
[6:20pm] jhodgdon: </report>
[6:22pm] GaborHojtsy: jhodgdon: I don’t think we want to remove the ability to link with titles
[6:22pm] jhodgdon: no
[6:22pm] GaborHojtsy: jhodgdon: or languages (which is also currently supported :)
[6:22pm] GaborHojtsy: jhodgdon++
[6:22pm] GaborHojtsy: jhodgdon: thanks for the reviews and for working with dawehner on that one, it will not be a simple one definitely :)
[6:22pm] GaborHojtsy: reyero: wanna go next?
[6:23pm] reyero: Ok, will be quick
[6:23pm] reyero: Posted follow up on https://www.drupal.org/node/2298687#comment-9400073
[6:23pm] Druplicon: https://www.drupal.org/node/2298687 => Fix interfaces implemented by Sequence/Mapping. Add a specific interface. Simplify both. [#2298687] => 46 comments, 18 IRC mentions
[6:24pm] reyero: tstoeckler, some question for you there ^
[6:24pm] reyero: and that's it
[6:24pm] tstoeckler: reyero: awesome, will have to look
[6:24pm] reyero: tstoeckler, great review btw, thanks
[6:24pm] GaborHojtsy: perfect, thank reyero :) I think the two of you are great on that one :)
[6:24pm] GaborHojtsy: reyero++
[6:24pm] GaborHojtsy: tstoeckler: wanna go next? :)
[6:25pm] tstoeckler: on the phone rightnow, can someone else go?
[6:27pm] GaborHojtsy: sure :D
[6:27pm] GaborHojtsy: vijaycs85: wanna go next?
[6:27pm] vijaycs85: GaborHojtsy: sure
[6:27pm] vijaycs85: Mostly reviewing  on config schema issues.
[6:28pm] vijaycs85: with GaborHojtsy
[6:28pm] vijaycs85: and reviewed https://www.drupal.org/node/2384853 with alexpott
[6:28pm] Druplicon: https://www.drupal.org/node/2384853 => Both configuration directories have to be specified in settings.php [#2384853] => 18 comments, 6 IRC mentions
[6:28pm] vijaycs85: that's it
[6:28pm] GaborHojtsy: vijaycs85: I wanted to ensure you can continue with the views fixes in a fully tested environment so I went ahead in https://www.drupal.org/node/2385805 :)
[6:28pm] Druplicon: https://www.drupal.org/node/2385805 => Views tests don't pass strict schema checking [#2385805] => 17 comments, 2 IRC mentions
[6:29pm] vijaycs85: GaborHojtsy: nice
[6:29pm] vijaycs85: GaborHojtsy: just 2 fails
[6:30pm] GaborHojtsy: vijaycs85: yeah those are “high profile” though
[6:30pm] vijaycs85: GaborHojtsy: :)
[6:30pm] GaborHojtsy: vijaycs85: one is display extenders, which alter the display so by definition not describable by schema, so we’ll need a 3rd party settings style approach IMHO
[6:30pm] dasrecht is now known as dasrecht_off.
[6:30pm] GaborHojtsy: vijaycs85: and the other one is display cloning, where the clone has settings that may not be valid for that type of display, that will be interesting also :D
[6:31pm] GaborHojtsy: vijaycs85: the prior fails were relatively straightforward mostly poblems in tests or missing schema but these ones are structural questions in views :D
[6:31pm] jibran: hi
[6:31pm] Druplicon: privet
[6:31pm] GaborHojtsy: vijaycs85: fun stuff
[6:31pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: heh, hi :)
[6:31pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: I thought you came to the D8 multilingual meeting to talk about that views schema question :)
[6:32pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: (meetings are logged)
[6:32pm] vijaycs85: GaborHojtsy: sure it is...
[6:32pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: Sorry I was away just came back
[6:32pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: yeah I have some questions regrading your fixes.
[6:33pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: ok, wanna talk in the meeting or after the meeting (in 30 min?)
[6:34pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: fine by me if you are not busy.
[6:34pm] GaborHojtsy: ok, let’s put it at the end
[6:34pm] naveeenvalecha joined the chat room.
[6:34pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy++
[6:34pm] GaborHojtsy: plach: wanna go next?
[6:35pm] plach: sure
[6:35pm] plach: these week I mostly reviewed stuff, but I kept the language widget/formatter issue alive
[6:36pm] plach: https://www.drupal.org/node/2230637#comment-9397931
[6:36pm] Druplicon: https://www.drupal.org/node/2230637 => Create a Language field widget and the related formatter [#2230637] => 116 comments, 45 IRC mentions
[6:36pm] plach: we should really close now
[6:36pm] plach: * should be
[6:36pm] GaborHojtsy: vijaycs85++
[6:36pm] skyred joined the chat room.
[6:36pm] alexpott left the chat room. (Quit: Leaving...)
[6:36pm] plach: franSeva told me he would work on addressing Wim's review
[6:36pm] plach: we should be RTBC afterwards
[6:36pm] plach: franSeva++
[6:36pm] GaborHojtsy: plach: is fran settled in the US now?
[6:37pm] plach: not sure
[6:37pm] plach: swentel and yched also helped by providing insights and code to fix the last test failure
[6:37pm] plach: swentel++
[6:37pm] plach: yched++
[6:37pm] roderik left the chat room. (Remote host closed the connection)
[6:38pm] plach: I also kept working on https://www.drupal.org/node/2143729
[6:38pm] Druplicon: https://www.drupal.org/node/2143729 => Regression: Entity definitions miss a language entity key [#2143729] => 127 comments, 4 IRC mentions
[6:38pm] GaborHojtsy: swentel++
[6:38pm] GaborHojtsy: yched++
[6:38pm] plach: I thought I had fixed all failures but I'm getting a weird testbot behavior
[6:38pm] GaborHojtsy: seen franSeva*?
[6:38pm] Druplicon: franSeva was last seen in #drupal-i18n 17 hours 11 min ago saying 'p_lach, I saw the review and I can help with it'.
[6:38pm] Druplicon: franSeva|demo was last seen in #drupal-es 3 weeks 8 hours ago saying 'j_onhattan, contigo quiero hablar de como colaborar con drush, para intentar mejorar la descripcion de los comandos. Ya te hago ping :p'.
[6:38pm] Druplicon: franSeva|testing was last seen in #drupal-i18n 3 weeks 18 hours ago saying 'D_ruplicon, franseva focus is  https://www.drupal.org/node/2230637 --> focus in test error with ContentTranslationUITest '.
[6:39pm] plach: I'll have to check with berdir what's going on, probably later tonight
[6:39pm] GaborHojtsy: plach: so looks like fran should be settled now :)
[6:39pm] plach: yep :)
[6:39pm] roderik joined the chat room.
[6:39pm] plach: aside from that we should be pretty close to RTBC too
[6:39pm] GaborHojtsy: plach: oh, the empty columns?
[6:40pm] plach: yep
[6:40pm] plach: we'll need reviews/RTBCs on both issues, I won't be able to
[6:40pm] plach: RTBC them
[6:40pm] plach: obviously
[6:40pm] GaborHojtsy: hm, I have not seen that problem before
[6:40pm] skyred: any example or documentation to show how to use Views to list all the translation of a content (typeP?
[6:40pm] plach: GaborHojtsy: neither did I, but tests are green on my box
[6:40pm] plach: my next focus would be https://www.drupal.org/node/2232477
[6:41pm] Druplicon: https://www.drupal.org/node/2232477 => Fatal when adding new fields with NOT NULL constraints in a base table that contains existing entities [#2232477] => 63 comments, 13 IRC mentions
[6:41pm] plach: to unblock the Content Translation metadata issue
[6:41pm] GaborHojtsy: plach: all makes sense, let us know when/if you need “final” RTBCs
[6:41pm] plach: :)
[6:41pm] plach: that's it, I'd say
[6:41pm] GaborHojtsy: plach++
[6:41pm] GaborHojtsy: plach: superb :)
[6:42pm] GaborHojtsy: skyred: you came into a middle of a logged multilingual meeting :) please ask in 20 min or so
[6:42pm] GaborHojtsy: tstoeckler: available now?
[6:42pm] tstoeckler: yup
[6:42pm] GaborHojtsy: tstoeckler: go!
[6:42pm] tstoeckler: tstoeckler: I worked on https://www.drupal.org/node/2144505 which got in in the meantime
[6:42pm] Druplicon: https://www.drupal.org/node/2144505 => Views does not use the text format type for formatted text [#2144505] => 47 comments, 8 IRC mentions
[6:42pm] tstoeckler: and https://www.drupal.org/node/2381147
[6:42pm] Druplicon: https://www.drupal.org/node/2381147 => Text and text with summary field default value config does not use the text_format schema type [#2381147] => 7 comments, 3 IRC mentions
[6:43pm] tstoeckler: that's it
[6:43pm] tstoeckler: reyero: I just read your updated patch. would you mind if I explain what I meant in the form of a patch?
[6:44pm] jhodgdon: tstoeckler++
[6:44pm] jhodgdon: tstoeckler: I already used that text_format schema in the configurable help contrib module!
[6:44pm] jhodgdon: tstoeckler: which is still a sandbox but pretty close (that is the one with the help topic entity)
[6:44pm] tstoeckler: jhodgdon: :-) yay!
[6:45pm] jhodgdon: (which got pushed off to 8.1.x)
[6:45pm] jhodgdon: tstoeckler: works like a charm; all I had to do is change the config schema from my manual mapping to the new field and patch worked
[6:45pm] tstoeckler: jhodgdon: I like it when things just work :-)
[6:45pm] plach left the chat room. (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
[6:45pm] jhodgdon: tstoeckler: me too! :)
[6:46pm] jhodgdon: tstoeckler: it helped that I had made my mapping match the field names you used. :)
[6:46pm] plach joined the chat room.
[6:46pm] reyero: tstoeckler, not at all, go ahead :-)
[6:46pm] tstoeckler: jhodgdon: yes, that bit us in the views issue. altering config sucks....
[6:46pm] tstoeckler: reyero: awesome
[6:46pm] lukebrooker joined the chat room.
[6:46pm] naveeenvalecha left the chat room. (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
[6:47pm] naveeenvalecha joined the chat room.
[6:47pm] roderik left the chat room. (Remote host closed the connection)
[6:48pm] GaborHojtsy: jhodgdon: yeah this mapping will be examplary for the rest of contrib now :)
[6:48pm] GaborHojtsy: jhodgdon: which was the other important reason to get it into core
[6:48pm] GaborHojtsy: tstoeckler++
[6:48pm] rodrigoaguilera is now known as nodrigoaguilera.
[6:48pm] jhodgdon: GaborHojtsy: definitely!!!!!!
[6:48pm] GaborHojtsy: penyaskito: you came after all?
[6:50pm] GaborHojtsy: so penyaskito worked with alexpott on https://www.drupal.org/node/2355909
[6:50pm] Druplicon: https://www.drupal.org/node/2355909 => language.settings config is not scalable [#2355909] => 112 comments, 61 IRC mentions
[6:50pm] GaborHojtsy: and decided on direction to completion I believe :)
[6:50pm] GaborHojtsy: that should unblock its followup for content_translation.settings
[6:51pm] GaborHojtsy: https://www.drupal.org/node/2363155
[6:51pm] Druplicon: https://www.drupal.org/node/2363155 => content_translation.settings config is not scalable [#2363155] => 3 comments, 5 IRC mentions
[6:51pm] GaborHojtsy: that is what penyaskito told me earlier today :)
[6:51pm] GaborHojtsy: penyaskito++
[6:51pm] GaborHojtsy: who did I forget?
[6:53pm] dasrecht_off is now known as dasrecht.
[6:53pm] GaborHojtsy: ok, nobody then let’s talk views config schemas jibran so its in the logs for posterity and then we can close the meeting :)
[6:53pm] GaborHojtsy: thanks all for coming :)
[6:54pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: so what is the question/concern?
[6:54pm] jibran: so If my contrib module is creating a style plugin then I have to provide config schema for default option?
[6:54pm] jibran: Do I have to provide schema for anything else?
[6:55pm] jhodgdon: GaborHojtsy++
[6:55pm] franSeva joined the chat room.
[6:55pm] franSeva: .
[6:55pm] bodisjw left the chat room. (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
[6:55pm] franSeva: GaborHojtsy, I'm late..
[6:55pm] rvilar left the chat room. (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
[6:56pm] GaborHojtsy: franSeva: a little :)
[6:56pm] GaborHojtsy: franSeva: np though
[6:56pm] franSeva: GaborHojtsy, I had a work meeting :S
[6:56pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: you would provide a view.style.$plugin_id
[6:56pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: for your style
[6:57pm] Javisr left the chat room. (Remote host closed the connection)
[6:57pm] javisr_ left the chat room. (Remote host closed the connection)
[6:57pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: see views.style.sschema.yml
[6:57pm] GaborHojtsy: only one s in schema >D
[6:57pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: does that answer the question?
[6:58pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: so view.style.$plugin_id will only define default options.
[6:58pm] GaborHojtsy: franSeva: plach said you are working on the language field and are close :)
[6:58pm] franSeva: GaborHojtsy, yep, I'm owrking in minor fix from a review
[6:59pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: all the options that the style may have
[7:00pm] GaborHojtsy: franSeva++
[7:00pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: Do I have to include the parent::options() as well? Or config schema will handle that for me?
[7:01pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: there is a views_style type for the common style options
[7:01pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: see views.data_types.schema.yml
[7:02pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: if you extend from another existing style, you should extend your schema type from that
[7:02pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: see views.style.schema.yml
[7:02pm] GaborHojtsy: views.style.unformatted_summary:
[7:02pm] GaborHojtsy:   type: views.style.default_summary
[7:02pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: this is an extension of another style
[7:03pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: you do the same extension tree in schema practically as in PHP
[7:04pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: But I am extending from StylePluginBase not the actual plugin
[7:04pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: right, that is modeled in views_style
[7:04pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: in views.data_types.schema.yml
[7:04pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: ok thanks fro clearing that :)
[7:04pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy++
[7:05pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: I have one more question.
[7:05pm] bodisjw joined the chat room.
[7:05pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: I have seen alexpott script for saving the views. Did you use it to save the test_views as well cuz I have a lot of test_views as well for contrib module
[7:05pm] jibran: modules*
[7:06pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: I don’t know how they were originally created
[7:07pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: you should be able to copy them from a site cmi export
[7:07pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: if alexpott’s script does that then it automates your work :)
[7:07pm] GaborHojtsy: (also remove the uuid)
[7:08pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: so how you did that for test_views issue?
[7:09pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: I didn’t :D
[7:09pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: I just worked on fixing their schemas and that was not possible to automate once the views existed
[7:09pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: You made the scheme changes and copied the cmi export to views yml file?
[7:09pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: I mean how do you tell of something if it was supposed to be using a field handler or a numeric or whatever
[7:10pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: the test views already existed, I just fixed them
[7:10pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: *manually*
[7:10pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: shocking?
[7:10pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: oh that is hard
[7:12pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: I was talking about this script https://gist.github.com/alexpott/f0650fbb7954df8497e4
[7:13pm] jhodgdon left the chat room.
[7:13pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: to script fixing prior views you would need to reserve engineer the supposed type based on the used keys which may or may not be trivial
[7:13pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: it may be possible to script but you would need to somehow compare the view data with possible schemas
[7:13pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: so doing the updates manually was way easier / faster
[7:15pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: I have written the scheme for DER (dynamic_entity_reference) and it was not fun I spent 10-12 hrs on that It is a very sharp learning curve that is why I was asking about script
[7:16pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: Maybe it is faster and easier for you but not to everybody :(
[7:17pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: and now with all the scheme type check before save and load it makes it a lot harder to fix it without proper config_test
[7:18pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: I don’t know of a script that reserve engineers parts of views against parts of config schemas, once views generates everything with proper plugin_ids which is currently the case, there should not need to be any need for fixing scripts
[7:18pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: imo config scheme test is a faster way to fix scheme then config inspector
[7:19pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: sure
[7:19pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: so I don’t have or know of a script
[7:19pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: I am happy to promote one especially if it takes less time to write than fixing schemas
[7:20pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: for any newly created views, that should not be an issue anymore
[7:22pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: for core it is true but if your view is using contib module one has to fix module schema to create proper view :)
[7:22pm] jibran: you are*
[7:22pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: yeah the point is contrib should have valid schemas :)
[7:23pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: heh
[7:23pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy:ok last question the views style plugin scheme talk is also correct for views field plugin?
[7:24pm] Kristen_Pol left the chat room. (Quit: Leaving.)
[7:24pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran: same thing yeah
[7:24pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: thanks
[7:24pm] GaborHojtsy: jhodgdon++
[7:24pm] GaborHojtsy: vijaycs85++
[7:24pm] GaborHojtsy: penyaskito++
[7:24pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy: thank you for your time and thank you for your work
[7:24pm] GaborHojtsy: tstoeckler++
[7:24pm] vijaycs85: GaborHojtsy++
[7:24pm] GaborHojtsy: plach++
[7:24pm] GaborHojtsy: reyero++
[7:24pm] vijaycs85: penyaskito++
[7:24pm] vijaycs85: jibran++
[7:24pm] GaborHojtsy: d8mi++
[7:24pm] vijaycs85: reyero++
[7:24pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy++
[7:24pm] GaborHojtsy: jibran++
[7:24pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy++
[7:24pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy++
[7:24pm] vijaycs85: plach++
[7:24pm] jibran: vijaycs85++
[7:24pm] jibran: GaborHojtsy++
[7:24pm] jibran: vijaycs85++
[7:24pm] GaborHojtsy: YesCT++
[7:25pm] vijaycs85: D8MI++
[7:25pm] GaborHojtsy: Kristen_Pol++
[7:25pm] vijaycs85: D*MI++
[7:25pm] vijaycs85: YesCT++
[7:25pm] vijaycs85: Kristen_Pol++
[7:25pm] vijaycs85: tstoeckler++
[7:25pm] jibran: Druplicon: karma D8MI?
[7:25pm] Druplicon: D8MI has karma of 136.
[7:25pm] jibran: WoW
[7:25pm] vijaycs85: jibran: :)
[7:25pm] GaborHojtsy: franSeva++
[7:25pm] vijaycs85: franSeva++
[7:25pm] vijaycs85: Druplicon: karma D*MI?
[7:25pm] Druplicon: D*MI has karma of 23.
[7:26pm] jibran: lol
[7:26pm] roderik joined the chat room.