[4:01 PM] ITS TIME! [4:01 PM] (or not?) [4:01 PM] OH, sorry! :) [4:01 PM] yup [4:01 PM] Got lost in #drupal-contribute for a minute. [4:01 PM] haha [4:01 PM] So, how's everyone doing? [4:02 PM] FINE! [4:02 PM] pretttty good [4:02 PM] yup yup all good [4:02 PM] cool cool :) It's so awesome that this room has been more chatty lately. [4:03 PM] recovering [4:03 PM] jacine +/- 60 people [4:03 PM] sooo let's review? :p [4:03 PM] Yeah, soooo special thank you to aspilicious!!! [4:03 PM] aspilicious rocked the issue queue over the weekend. [4:03 PM] html5 sprint? [4:03 PM] html5 sprint is http://bit.ly/html5-sprint [4:03 PM] aspilicious: öwesome [4:04 PM] That queue is in awesome shape… and needs reviews! [4:04 PM] tlattimore_ quit IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) [4:04 PM] He made sure everything in there has an updated patch, ready for review, which is so very awesome. [4:04 PM] im still waiting for that contextual thang to go away ;) [4:04 PM] aspilicious++ [4:04 PM] aspilicious++ [4:04 PM] mortendk, ok can we start with the css stuff? [4:04 PM] whoops [4:04 PM] sure :) [4:04 PM] http://drupal.org/node/1217012 [4:04 PM] http://drupal.org/node/1217012 => Clean up the CSS for the Node module => Drupal core, node.module, normal, needs review, 41 comments, 8 IRC mentions [4:05 PM] Lets group nitpick this issue untill it's fixed [4:05 PM] I just uploaded a new patch that removes a css include [4:05 PM] aspilicious: i cant nitpick [4:05 PM] cool [4:05 PM] yeah, I was thinking that we should combine the comment + node CSS cleanup actually. [4:05 PM] because we are updating those classes to be more general, and that affects the comment module's CSS too. [4:06 PM] jacine can't we split them for now? [4:06 PM] JohnAlbin_ joined the channel [4:06 PM] I mean can we update noe without breaking comment? [4:06 PM] node* [4:06 PM] aspilicious: There's duplicate work going on. [4:07 PM] jacine yeah but if we mark this rtbc today [4:07 PM] chrisstrahl joined the channel [4:07 PM] that problem is gone [4:07 PM] aspilicious: yeah, if we can do that, great. [4:07 PM] so, let's look at it ;) [4:07 PM] (srry for being over enthousiastic today) [4:07 PM] my gf banned me to my desk for that [4:08 PM] I think it's ready, other than that fact that it'd be nice to get it done in one shot, but that's fine. [4:08 PM] JohnAlbin quit IRC (Ping timeout: 255 seconds) [4:08 PM] JohnAlbin_ is now known as JohnAlbin [4:08 PM] jacine, I think this will go faster [4:08 PM] aspilicious: you're probably right :) [4:08 PM] so what issue ppl ? [4:08 PM] http://drupal.org/node/1217012 [4:08 PM] http://drupal.org/node/1217012 => Clean up the CSS for the Node module => Drupal core, node.module, normal, needs review, 41 comments, 9 IRC mentions [4:08 PM] copy pasted it, I knwe someone would ask [4:09 PM] While reviewing that issue last week ( I didn't finish) I was looking at jyve's patch in #32 [4:09 PM] aspilicious: are we looking at patch 42 [4:09 PM] He's already fixed the lowercase hex color issue we talked about [4:10 PM] mortendk, yeah the last one [4:10 PM] and everything else I looked over looked good [4:10 PM] ok, so let's RTBC it now ;) who wants to do it? haha. [4:10 PM] If someone can apply it to his localhost [4:10 PM] and check if the colors are ok [4:10 PM] for sticky [4:10 PM] unpublished [4:10 PM] but I hadn't gotten to system.theme.css yet [4:10 PM] yeah im gonna try and see if the fuckest explodes ;) [4:10 PM] it's on my list to do today so I will go do it now and check [4:10 PM] preview [4:11 PM] mortendk, raskull ok great, if preview/sticky/unpublished works [4:11 PM] and everything is ok please rtbc [4:11 PM] Ok jacine, next? :p [4:11 PM] someone wannna look at this one ? [4:11 PM] http://drupal.org/node/1216978 [4:11 PM] http://drupal.org/node/1216978 => Clean up the CSS for Contextual module => Drupal core, contextual.module, normal, needs review, 86 comments, 16 IRC mentions [4:11 PM] LOL [4:12 PM] I love it, I don't even have to paste in issues anymore :P [4:12 PM] Ok [4:12 PM] We will kill that one now [4:12 PM] scor quit IRC (Quit: scor) [4:12 PM] :) [4:12 PM] I am completely ok with morten's latest patch. [4:12 PM] should probably comment about it. this is a tough one. [4:13 PM] aspilicious quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer) [4:13 PM] aspilicious joined the channel [4:14 PM] Yes, some of the selectors are very specific, but that's done on purpose here to prevent issues like this: http://drupal.org/node/675608 [4:14 PM] http://drupal.org/node/675608 => Contextual link colors easily overwritten => Drupal core, contextual.module, normal, active, 26 comments, 5 IRC mentions [4:14 PM] yeah I understand that [4:14 PM] I'll apply the patch and see if I have any remarks [4:14 PM] else I will rtbc [4:14 PM] aspilicious++ [4:15 PM] Anyone else want to do the same? I think we should tag team this for real. [4:15 PM] It's a big one. [4:15 PM] yup its a nasty mofo and we did a lot of rewriting [4:15 PM] yeah I will look also [4:15 PM] We should make sure that we don't introduce any serious issues and that it's all up to snuff. [4:15 PM] rasskull: thanks! :) [4:15 PM] jacine, and you can look at http://drupal.org/node/1189834 in the meanwhile [4:15 PM] http://drupal.org/node/1189834 => Convert book-export-html.tpl.php to HTML5 => Drupal core, theme system, normal, needs review, 23 comments, 9 IRC mentions [4:16 PM] I think you want to have a different approach but hey it's green :p [4:16 PM] lookin [4:17 PM] aspilicious: So, I used to want a different approach, but in practice it makes the code more messy. I am honestly onboard with JohnAlbin and would like to try and get rid of html.tpl.php, so that kinda squashes that plan. [4:17 PM] It would be nice to simplify the hook name. [4:17 PM] (and the template) [4:17 PM] oh god no... [4:17 PM] :p [4:17 PM] book-export-html.tpl.php is just ugh. [4:17 PM] thats a new issue first [4:17 PM] just like maintenance [4:18 PM] that is such a cop out [4:18 PM] but whatever…. just makes a whole new cycle and bike shedding session. [4:18 PM] hahah [4:19 PM] I swear I feel like renaming all these issues to be more inline with what this initiative is doing, but I cannot come up with a good title and I am lazy. [4:19 PM] LOL [4:19 PM] but, ok. I will test this one for ya. [4:20 PM] So, really the only other one that needs something help is theme_datetime() again. :( [4:20 PM] poor linclark [4:20 PM] and jbeach :( [4:20 PM] mortendk, did you change the styling of contextual links on purpose? [4:20 PM] aspilicious: the styles didn't change. [4:21 PM] jacine I have the feeling there is more space [4:21 PM] will compare with D7 [4:21 PM] well we romoved some of the support for old crap [4:21 PM] but didnt change marg / padding etc [4:21 PM] aspilicious: that shouldn't be the case. [4:21 PM] but we dropped the px for the font sizings [4:21 PM] mortendk: not sure about 'accidental' in comments [4:21 PM] people are soooo much more excited about css than they are about date formatting [4:21 PM] who woulda guessed ;) [4:22 PM] linclark: LOL. No, this is just complicated for some of us. Haha. [4:22 PM] linclark: If you can do an issue summary update, I will write a blog post about this asking for help (if you think that's a good idea). [4:23 PM] sure [4:23 PM] mortendk, jacine D8 is definitly bigger than D7 [4:23 PM] linclark: awesome. I will do that ASAP. We need to get this done, so life can be fun for you again. [4:23 PM] aspilicious: i think that some one at some point removed the font sizing ? [4:23 PM] mortendk, it needs to go back than [4:23 PM] why ? [4:23 PM] hell no [4:24 PM] LOL [4:24 PM] It's huge [4:24 PM] let's check the logs [4:24 PM] why do we want druplal core to put in px sizing for fonts ? [4:24 PM] font sizing does not belong in there IMO. [4:24 PM] it throws the whole font-sizing setup of themes off. [4:24 PM] jacine: me thinx it was jesse that changed it to small - i had it at 14px [4:24 PM] Why can't bartik or seven set the font size? [4:25 PM] themes should definitely set the font size [4:25 PM] dcmouyard: do you know the reasons behind not using named font sizes? I know there was a thread about this somewhere. [4:25 PM] jacine lol [4:25 PM] seriously core should not set font sizing [4:25 PM] D8 has the font-size too [4:25 PM] seriously, it's a problem. [4:25 PM] (chrome developer tools) [4:26 PM] toolbar has the same issue [4:26 PM] jacine: I think named font sizes are inconsistent across browsers [4:26 PM] *shuffles into the room* [4:27 PM] hi all [4:27 PM] I don't remember seeing a Drupal issue about it [4:27 PM] hi jbeach [4:27 PM] dcmouyard: yeah, i gotta find that thread… it was for D7 i believe. [4:27 PM] hey jbeach :D [4:27 PM] named font sizes are different … afaik maybe that changed havent used then for real in years [4:27 PM] yep, me neither. [4:27 PM] jacine, mortendk font-size: small !important; [4:27 PM] EWWWWW [4:28 PM] ush wheres that ? [4:28 PM] in D7 [4:28 PM] thats why it's smaller [4:28 PM] jacine: I got now Drupal stuff done this sprint. :( [4:28 PM] now -> no [4:28 PM] jbeach: I still love you. [4:28 PM] LOL [4:28 PM] jbeach: were nagging over font sizings in drupal core ;) [4:28 PM] no wonder this initiative is doing so well [4:28 PM] so mortendk you have to come up with a viking solution to make those links smaller again ;) [4:28 PM] jacine is giving everybody a guilt complex [4:28 PM] :P [4:28 PM] LOL no ;) [4:29 PM] aspilicious: hmmm my usual trashcan -> set it in bartik ;) [4:29 PM] mortendk [4:29 PM] jacine loves everyone and is grateful for the time everyone puts in and understands everyone cannot work on this stuff all the time. [4:29 PM] using keywords? [4:29 PM] jacine also hugs #drupal-html5 [4:29 PM] like small, x-small? [4:29 PM] etc [4:29 PM] I think it's more future-proof [4:29 PM] rather than hard values [4:30 PM] dcmouyard, I'm completely guilty! [4:30 PM] yeah, but it screws up the flow of your themes if you are trying to keep things consistent. [4:30 PM] mortendk, hmm so all the themes should add this themselves? [4:30 PM] It's working! [4:30 PM] check out rem (the unknown cousin of em) [4:30 PM] jacine: I was just teasing! [4:30 PM] jacine, I'll make a screenshot so you'll see how big it is [4:30 PM] Ugh, I wish we could use rem so badly. [4:30 PM] dcmouyard: I know ;) haha. [4:31 PM] I felt guilty for beeing sick last weekend and not working on issues... [4:31 PM] aspilicious: I have tested it already ;) [4:31 PM] jacine, ow is it just me than? :p [4:31 PM] i can live with a rem solution ;) [4:31 PM] aspilicious: No, haha. I just think that the themes should set the font-size. [4:32 PM] I'm totally down with rem [4:32 PM] and i can actually live with a px to ;) *sssh* [4:32 PM] rem is the shit [4:32 PM] but I don't think it's ready for production yet [4:32 PM] yep [4:32 PM] rem its *only* ie8 ;) [4:32 PM] jacine can you live with the px approach? [4:32 PM] http://caniuse.com/#search=rem [4:32 PM] I personally use % for font sizes [4:33 PM] honestly… maybe we should discuss a real solution to this shit [4:33 PM] cuz, it pains me to see font-size anything in module CSS. [4:33 PM] Crell joined the channel [4:33 PM] yeah thats actually the thing - i would rather see that in a theme instead [4:33 PM] Crell! [4:33 PM] Crell: wooho [4:33 PM] You mentioned there was <3 in here. [4:34 PM] haha ;) [4:34 PM] Crell goes quiet again to not interrupt the Themer <3. [4:34 PM] Crell: there is love & nidpicking [4:34 PM] (function () { return <3; } () ) [4:34 PM] I'm not a themere [4:34 PM] mortendk: Same thing. [4:34 PM] does anybody know if rem will be supported in the next Opera mini/mobile versions? [4:34 PM] So, it's annoying to have to set the font-size for things like Toolbar and Contextual links in every theme. [4:34 PM] yeah after working on a bajillion themes doing font-size overrides gets tiring [4:35 PM] It's a bad thing IMO [4:35 PM] But, is there any other way we can handle this without doing that? [4:35 PM] jacine: isn't that what *.theme.css is for? [4:35 PM] and we can use font-size:small ? [4:35 PM] yeah! [4:35 PM] dcmouyard: Yeah, but even still. LOL. [4:35 PM] theme guys and girls [4:35 PM] can KILL it [4:35 PM] It still pains me. haha. [4:35 PM] with a single line [4:35 PM] dcmouyard: http://my.opera.com/ODIN/blog/2011/12/06/hello-opera-11-60 [4:35 PM] I like the font size keywords personally. They work better across devices [4:35 PM] jacine: ok, updated http://drupal.org/node/1183250 [4:36 PM] okay fuck it use 12 px for the toolbar & contextual - so we can get the shit outta here [4:36 PM] http://drupal.org/node/1183250 => Add a theme_datetime() function to consistently theme dates and datetimes => Drupal core, theme system, normal, needs review, 169 comments, 27 IRC mentions [4:36 PM] Bojhan joined the channel [4:36 PM] linclark: awesome :) [4:36 PM] jacine puts writing a post on her list. [4:36 PM] Opera 11.60 supports the rem unit and also render inset box shadows on input text elements (here is an example). [4:36 PM] hey jhood! :) [4:36 PM] thanks jhood [4:36 PM] dborg quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer) [4:36 PM] hey, I've been lurking :) [4:37 PM] well if it does … why dont use rem ? [4:37 PM] we can't use rem because of IE8. [4:37 PM] (and IE7) [4:37 PM] Because, dude, REM got old years ago. Are they even still touring? [4:37 PM] Crell runs. [4:37 PM] drupalborg joined the channel [4:37 PM] jhood: I was more interested in rem support for Opera Mobile and Opera Mini [4:37 PM] LOL!!! [4:38 PM] drupalborg quit IRC (Changing host) [4:38 PM] drupalborg joined the channel [4:38 PM] tvn quit IRC (Quit: Quit) [4:38 PM] mortendk, can you reroll the patch for the contextual stuff? [4:38 PM] linclark: apologies for being absent [4:38 PM] I've been on the command line for two weeks [4:38 PM] drupalborg is now known as dborg [4:38 PM] Speaking of IE7, has everyone in here commented on the dropping IE7 support issue? [4:38 PM] I did [4:38 PM] Crell has not. [4:38 PM] http://drupal.org/node/1217788 [4:38 PM] I'm a windows user [4:38 PM] http://drupal.org/node/1217788 => Drop IE7 support in Drupal core => Drupal core, base system, normal, needs work, 68 comments, 8 IRC mentions [4:38 PM] so I am the only one that can speak in that issue [4:38 PM] :p [4:39 PM] aspilicious: what should be rerolled ;) [4:39 PM] whats did we end with ? [4:39 PM] Ok, well everyone who hasn't please do… [4:39 PM] jbeach: no worries, jacine's going to broadcast a call for review and hopefully we will finally put that sucker to bed [4:39 PM] Re font sizes: Is the question is whether core should be setting font sizes period, as opposed to what method it uses? [4:39 PM] can we do a rem to px fallback option for IE 7-8 like this blog outlines? http://snook.ca/archives/html_and_css/font-size-with-rem [4:39 PM] jacine: will do [4:39 PM] we are discussing methods now [4:39 PM] contextual used small!important [4:39 PM] or something like that [4:39 PM] were not gonna have an !important anywhere ;) [4:39 PM] I got a new job in October, and I love the fact that I don't need to support IE6 and IE7 anymore [4:39 PM] Crell proposes dropping support for everything but Chrome nightlies. [4:39 PM] stevetweeddale: We can't get away from it in all cases, especially for things like Toolbar module and Contextual links. [4:40 PM] mortendk, just make it look like D7 [4:40 PM] I don't care [4:40 PM] :p [4:40 PM] New company is all about teaching the client [4:40 PM] how [4:40 PM] linclark: excellent [4:40 PM] dcmouyard: I'm jealous. [4:40 PM] lol Crell +1 [4:40 PM] aspilicious: he he wlell it would be sweet to find a method that we wanna use everywhere ;) [4:40 PM] Crell will stop trolling now. [4:40 PM] if it doesn't do CSS3 3D transforms, I don't support it [4:41 PM] jacine: right. apologies for making noise in here a couple of months back and then doing nothing. the proverbial hit the fan at work, and then kinda didn't stop [4:41 PM] mortendk, hmm what are the options? Choose a pixel number? [4:41 PM] mortendk kicks rupl in the nuts [4:41 PM] stevetweeddale: np ;) [4:42 PM] Alright, so I think we can move on from this discussion right now [4:42 PM] jacine: nowt worse than noisy people that don't get anything done! [4:42 PM] jhood: All of the fallbacks for rem that I've seen involve using px/em/% and rem, so it's not really efficient [4:42 PM] stevetweeddale: haha ;) [4:42 PM] aspilicious: well what me jacine & jbeach have been discussing is the why do we even have a font size in core [4:42 PM] We need to pick some new issues. [4:42 PM] totes def [4:42 PM] And I know that theme_breadcrumb was requested, so let's add that. [4:42 PM] yeah and fallbacks usually ends up biting us in the ass [4:43 PM] mortendk: take it back. now. http://attasi.com/labs/ipad/ [4:43 PM] jacine, I finished this one: http://drupal.org/node/1174640 [4:43 PM] http://drupal.org/node/1174640 => Add new HTML5 FAPI element: number => Drupal core, forms system, normal, needs review, 39 comments, 4 IRC mentions [4:43 PM] MediaDoneRight quit IRC (Quit: I'm not a quitter, I just had something else to do ;-)) [4:43 PM] well, things certainly seem to have come along since I last made it to a meeting! \o/ [4:43 PM] rupl: ooooh fuck we need that everywhere [4:43 PM] aspilicious: woo hooo! [4:43 PM] oh great don't show that to our clients :) [4:43 PM] jacine: JohnAlbin wanted to add this one: http://drupal.org/node/1347266 [4:43 PM] http://drupal.org/node/1347266 => Convert theme_breadcrumb() to HTML5 => Drupal core, markup, normal, needs review, 20 comments, 3 IRC mentions [4:43 PM] mortendk, because things like toolbars are contextual links are not rly seen as part of the theme (my experience with my users) [4:44 PM] dcmouyard: yup, just said that, tagging now ;) [4:44 PM] are => and [4:44 PM] ok… done :) [4:44 PM] jacine & jbeach what you say to the font sizings ? [4:44 PM] I'd also like to add http://drupal.org/node/1183042 [4:44 PM] http://drupal.org/node/1183042 => Add WAI-ARIA roles to Core blocks => Drupal core, markup, normal, needs review, 45 comments, 2 IRC mentions [4:44 PM] im fine with a hardcoded value for ONLY contextual & toolbar [4:44 PM] mortendk: I don't want them, but I foresee complaints about having to set them all the time. [4:44 PM] rupl: that demo is ridiculous! [4:45 PM] jacine: yup and we will send em all to you [4:45 PM] LOL [4:45 PM] mortendk drupal8.dev is screwing him over [4:46 PM] mortendk: I repeat webchick's wisdom at dire moments: "Embrace the chaos" [4:46 PM] yoroy_ joined the channel [4:46 PM] jacine I found an issue with the node css patch [4:46 PM] rupl: that's frickin cool! [4:46 PM] aspilicious: oh? [4:46 PM] jacine an unpublished node in D7 doesn't get the unmublished background color in bartik [4:46 PM] mortendk, I"m fine with hard-coded values for core modules if it makes it less brittle [4:47 PM] it's striped through in the css editor [4:47 PM] aspilicious: good catch! :) [4:47 PM] http://css-tricks.com/2580-css-font-size/ [4:47 PM] jbeach cool jacine ? [4:47 PM] jacine I think Bartik wants the color to be white, always [4:47 PM] x-small ? [4:47 PM] aspilicious: hmm, are you sure? I don't think so. [4:48 PM] I can't seem to find out what is overriding the color in D7 [4:48 PM] I don't see anything in the CSS coding standards about font sizes http://drupal.org/node/302199 [4:48 PM] http://drupal.org/node/302199 => CSS coding standards => 0 comments, 28 IRC mentions [4:48 PM] although it does use em in an example [4:48 PM] dcmouyard: that's because we don't want them ;) [4:48 PM] dcmouyard: they need to be zoomable to 200% that's the only rule. [4:49 PM] then it should be in % or em [4:49 PM] mortendk: Is "small" still too big? [4:49 PM] not all browsers can zoom px [4:49 PM] dcmouyard: yes, but the rule is for themes. :P [4:49 PM] jacine: ask aspilicious ;) [4:49 PM] dcmouyard: yes, all the browsers we support do [4:49 PM] yoroy quit IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) [4:49 PM] yoroy_ is now known as yoroy [4:49 PM] IE6 was the straggler [4:49 PM] dcmouyard: we dont support ie6 ;) [4:50 PM] haha [4:50 PM] there are some mobile browsers that don't zoom px [4:50 PM] small is ok if it is as big as in D7 (or almost as big) [4:50 PM] bikeshed!!! :) [4:50 PM] let me see if I can find that article again… it was from last summer [4:50 PM] dcmouyard: strawman arg [4:50 PM] dcmouyard: we dont support every obscure browser out there [4:50 PM] dcmouyard: mobile browsers don't support a desktop PHP web app [4:51 PM] what about the mobile push for D8? [4:51 PM] dcmouyard: well we dont even know wherer they wanna go what were gonna support etc [4:51 PM] timplunkett, we need you [4:51 PM] If there is a problem they can address it. [4:52 PM] we can theme in the blind [4:52 PM] I don't have a strong opinion, but that's why I use % [4:52 PM] where are we even using font-size in modules right now. [4:52 PM] I don't want to spend too much time on this, because i think it is like only a couple of odd exceptions where we do. [4:53 PM] tars16 joined the channel [4:53 PM] are these logs still published? I gtg. [4:53 PM] dcmouyard: I was having these same thoughts a couple months back. but we can't just let our conventions stagnate to accommodate increasingly fragmented devices [4:53 PM] i have strong opinions against using em or % in core [4:53 PM] yes, i think that in core module CSS ems/% actually are worse. [4:53 PM] lets cross the bridges when we get there [4:53 PM] I don't think there is a good solution here. [4:53 PM] mortendk: do you have any opinions which are NOT strong? :p [4:53 PM] rupl: LOL [4:54 PM] rupl: ;) [4:54 PM] stevetweeddale: yes, I'll post it tomorrow [4:54 PM] So, we are running out of time - let's pick one more issue for this sprint. [4:54 PM] jhood++ [4:54 PM] jacine mortendk: let's discuss font-size thing later. I'm definitely interested in the em% bashing... [4:54 PM] dcmouyard: yup [4:54 PM] its actually better in a bar ;) [4:54 PM] jhood: shweeeet. thanks. Am trying to get the lay of the land again. maybe, y'know actually contribute [4:55 PM] it will be posted here http://groups.drupal.org/node/190524 [4:55 PM] have fun all! [4:55 PM] http://groups.drupal.org/node/190524 => Drupal 8 HTML5 Initiative Meeting #15 => 0 comments, 2 IRC mentions [4:55 PM] mortendk++ [4:55 PM] im never gonna get this contextual shit closed ;) [4:55 PM] dcmouyard: Yeah, it might be worth opening a coding standards issue for it, even if the end result is that "you can only even define font-sizes in X modules" [4:55 PM] x-small ?? [4:55 PM] jacine: ++ [4:55 PM] (for drupal core) [4:55 PM] mortendk: I don't know, got a screenshot? [4:55 PM] jacine: sounds like a great idea [4:55 PM] dcmouyard: cool :) [4:56 PM] nopes im batteling with my d8 installartion to check node patch [4:56 PM] So… shall I pick another issue or does someone else want to pick one? [4:56 PM] jacine: did you see my earlier issue suggestion? [4:56 PM] http://drupal.org/node/1183042 [4:56 PM] http://drupal.org/node/1183042 => Add WAI-ARIA roles to Core blocks => Drupal core, markup, normal, needs review, 45 comments, 3 IRC mentions [4:56 PM] mortendk wants to discuss why we have a #node-nid ;) [4:56 PM] dcmouyard: no, sorry! [4:57 PM] we talked about it in the accessibility meeting today [4:57 PM] dcmouyard: oh, well we could add that, but that's like 99.9% done. [4:57 PM] I expect that to be RTBC by tonight. [4:57 PM] easy wins… :) [4:57 PM] LOL [4:57 PM] we have a lot of work to do! :D [4:57 PM] hahaha [4:57 PM] alright, I will tag it. [4:59 PM] oki doki ;) [4:59 PM] html5 sprint? [4:59 PM] html5 sprint is http://bit.ly/html5-sprint [4:59 PM] jacine, I'm going to ask timplunkett why the unpublished color osn't working [4:59 PM] eh? [4:59 PM] haha :) [4:59 PM] timplunkett, you worked on bartik? [4:59 PM] right [4:59 PM] It's probably just a specificity problem. [5:00 PM] samkottler quit IRC (Quit: Leaving.) [5:00 PM] well take a bartik D7 site [5:00 PM] and unpublish a node [5:00 PM] aspilicious: it looks good [5:00 PM] timplunkett, the background color for unpublished doesn't work [5:00 PM] in D7 [5:00 PM] in bartik [5:00 PM] aspilicious: the color works fine in d8 [5:00 PM] jacine: how about adding another css cleanup issue? [5:00 PM] so i'm wondering if they did it on purpose [5:00 PM] marktfrey quit IRC (Quit: marktfrey) [5:00 PM] mortendk, yeah but it's different so I wonna know why [5:00 PM] :) [5:01 PM] timplunkett unpublishes a node [5:01 PM] aspilicious: dammit you want me to use my brain ? [5:01 PM] mortendk, I'll be the brains you be the css viking [5:01 PM] dcmouyard: well, we've already got 7 issues in here that are outstanding. [5:01 PM] dcmouyard: Which one do you want? [5:01 PM] aspilicious: btw loves the change from node-preview to preview [5:02 PM] no preference [5:02 PM] but most the of the issues are pretty close to rtbc, no? [5:02 PM] dcmouyard: I don't really wanna up that number, given that we tend not to get that many done. [5:02 PM] they were all close 2 weeks ago too. [5:02 PM] aspilicious: http://drupalcode.org/project/drupal.git/blob/refs/heads/7.x:/themes/bartik/css/style.css#l605 [5:03 PM] dcmouyard: but, that doesn't mean we can't work on whatever we want anyway :) [5:03 PM] aspilicious: yep, that was partially my fault [5:03 PM] aspilicious: http://drupal.org/node/862854 [5:03 PM] http://drupal.org/node/862854 => No styling for sticky => Drupal core, Bartik theme, normal, needs review, 75 comments, 10 IRC mentions [5:03 PM] samkottler joined the channel [5:03 PM] aspilicious: there is a patch! http://drupal.org/node/862854#comment-5194356 [5:04 PM] http://drupal.org/node/862854 => No styling for sticky => Drupal core, Bartik theme, normal, needs review, 75 comments, 11 IRC mentions [5:04 PM] oops, gotta go [5:04 PM] great meeting! [5:04 PM] Alright, well thanks everyone! [5:04 PM] see ya dcmouyard :) [5:04 PM] dcmouyard left the channel ()