Content Audit section progress

We've auditing part of the drupal.org content (see http://drupal.org/community-initiatives/drupalorg-content-strategy and http://groups.drupal.org/node/139814).

Audit is now over. Fixing what's there is next.

Sections that have been audited to 3 levels deep in the book structure

About Drupal - http://content.redesign.devdrupal.org/about-needs-auditing

(don't auditing anything within the Sites Made with Drupal section; will be dealt with separately)

Drupal CMS features - http://content.redesign.devdrupal.org/features

Getting Started - http://content.redesign.devdrupal.org/getting-started-needs-auditing

Drupal.org FAQ - http://content.redesign.devdrupal.org/about/drupal.org-FAQ

Reference - http://content.redesign.devdrupal.org/reference-needs-auditing

Getting Involved Guide - http://content.redesign.devdrupal.org/getting-involved-guide

How to access the audit site

Access to to http://content.redesign.devdrupal.org requires a password. The passwords is in the httpauth popup box!

You will need me to reset your password before logging in to the site, as it's a sanitized version of the d.o. site. Find me on #drupal-contribute in IRC or contact me directly using my contact form.

Ready to audit?

First, familiarize yourself with the established drupal.org interface style guidelines at http://drupal.org/contribute/documentation/guide/style

For each node in your assigned section:

1. Read the node's content.
2. Summary: Write a brief summary of the page's content (including whether images are present)
3. Purpose: identify the purpose of the page
4. Problems: Note down general & particular problems with the page:

• Does it contain redundant info (is this content covered elsewhere? If yes, note down the node ID where it is covered)
• Is it in the wrong place (does another page make more sense?
• Does the content need restructuring? Please give examples.
• Is it inaccurate? Don't spend time researching the inaccuracies, but if you think the content is inaccurate, let's say so.
• Is it useful? Does it add value? Or just wasting people's time? Just because it exists, doesn't mean we have to keep it forever and ever!
• Does it need English grammar, spelling, punctuation improvements?
• Does the tone and style meet the guidelines? http://drupal.org/contribute/documentation/guide/style
• Is it written to be understood by an "outsider"... that is, someone not that familiar with Drupal but is perhaps evaluating it for the first time?
• Is there any key information that's missing?
• Does the url path not make sense? As a top level or important page, does it need it's own path?
• Could the content be supported by an image or illustration? If yes, what?