UK Drupal Association - Proposal

Events happening in the community are now at Drupal community events on www.drupal.org.
steven jones's picture

So we've talked about having some kind of official body for Drupal in the UK before, and there's been a lot of ideas and general support, but nothing has really happened. I've come to realise that the body that I think the UK needs would actually be quite low-impact and thus we should just push on with it.

It is not my intention to 'take over' or control the Drupal community in the UK, even if such a thing were possible. In my ideal vision for the 'UK Drupal Association' I'm not actually involved very much at all.

Drupal in the UK

The UK is blessed by lots of individual regional groups of Drupalers, organising regular meetups and quite a few Drupalcamps (at least three this year.) They already do a fantastic job of promoting Drupal through events, and people already give a lot of their time to these regional groups.

We have an opportunity to pool our knowledge and support each other by creating an organisation that doesn't set out to put on events, but sets out to help others put on events. In this way we don't step on people's toes, we don't have to decide if we want to organise events in London, or in Leeds, instead we support others to organise events in both places.

My vision is that people active in the Association are not burnt out organising an event on the other side of the country, but are available to coach others through the process and generally be a source of knowledge.

The proposal

To create an association we basically just need to agree that we have one, it doesn't actually need any formal legal standing at all1. I have copied and adapted a simple constitution from the Irish and Scottish Drupal associations. You can view it here: http://groups.drupal.org/node/239538

A summary of the constitution is that basically we have a large pool of members, they elect a committee who in turn support others and have control over and responsibility for any money the association has.

You are a member of the Association by joining the 'United Kingdom' group on groups.drupal.org. I'm proposing this for a number of reasons: firstly because groups.drupal.org is managed by a bigger community, which means that if any of the group admins go crazy, you have some recourse for wrestling control back; secondly because there are lot of people and groups already here; thirdly it's an open, transparent, venue for discussion. Note that currently I'm the only group admin in this group, which I'm really not happy about, we'll be adding other group admins asap.

The deadline

Really not sure how this works, but I'm going to say that we 'agree' to this on the 17th July 2012. So we have until then to change what we all agree to! After that we'll need to hold a AGM to appoint the first committee. Don't be scared by this 'deadline', it just means that something will definitely happen.

EDIT: The community wanted more time to discuss the proposal so I've removed the somewhat artificial 'deadline'.

The geographic scope

If you didn't know already, there are already associations in Scotland and Northern Ireland, which are part of the UK; We aren't trying to usurp them or take them over. We will work with them to promote Drupal worldwide. We will do sensible things like not planning an event in London on the same date as one in Edinburgh.

The details

There are still a few details that need to be worked out:

  1. The name - we are in discussions with Dries' lawyers about the name of the Association, so this is subject to change.
  2. How general meetings work, i.e. are they online meetings, or do we meet a specific Drupalcamp etc.
  3. Something else that I've not thought of.

The response

Let me know what you think using the comment form below.

EDIT: It wasn't clear in the above text, but all this is up for discussion and I'm happy to change the proposal until it meets with acceptance or we decide that we really don't want it after all.


  1. We can absolutely incorporate the association at some later date, but to keep things simple to begin with, we don't need to. See: http://www.netlawman.co.uk/info/unincorporated-associations.php for details of what we're trying to set up initially. 

Comments

great start

kae76's picture

I'm happy to get involved :-)

I like this

mcjim's picture

I like this idea. Thanks for putting it forward :-)
I think it would encourage more events and groups, and perhaps help amplify the voices of the UK community.

Sounds like a great idea

galooph's picture

Count me in!

Nice one

kiwimind's picture

I think that this is a great start to this conversation. It will be interesting to see where it goes.

I think this is a very

MChall's picture

I think this is a very pragmatic approach to forming the association and to assigning a deadline - we are all busy people and if we have to much time for discussion it could drag on.

good

luukyb's picture

Thanks steven.
Agree that we need a kind of deadline to make things happening.

On board

chriscohen's picture

Tigerfish are on board with this idea. We need a central authority in the UK, if only because we need somewhere to bank and then spend all the money from tickets, etc.

Thank you for taking the lead

Stefan van Hooft's picture

Thank you Steven for taking the lead on this! It was good to talk to you in Oxford and I would be happy to come on board and help wherever possible.

Further to point 2 re meetings, perhaps it could be a combination? Eg. organise a meeting during a camp and have others, who are unable to attend, join in via video Skype.

Stefan van Hooft
iCompute
Twitter | LinkedIn
--8<---------------------------

Great stuff

willhallonline's picture

I think that certainly the idea of being able to co-ordinate UK Drupal stuff is great. As long as it doesn't become burdensome on the committee members it should be great. I realise that this was mentioned some time ago, glad we can still try to move on with it.

I particularly like the idea that we just need to agree to have a UK Drupal Association. Personally I guess I already know UK Drupallers from 5/6 of the meetups (possibly more). Looking forward to hearing more and getting involved.

Brilliant news!

jp.stacey's picture

Thanks for giving this a push, Steven. I've mentioned it here at Torchbox and we think it's a great idea. It sounds like for a modest amount of initial effort the UK Drupal community should end up with more of a toolkit (especially with financial and organizational tools) for making future events easier to plan and run.

Association

iaine's picture

If memory serves, Finn Lewis and Colin Sherry have already done something on the financial side from our recent Oxford Drupalcamp. (Sorry if I've misunderstood this).

Re: meetings, personally prefer the idea of Skype/online ones and then meet up in real space every few months. If there are any decisions that need to be made, then it ought to be at a quorate real life meeting rather than virtual. Agree with that committee members should rotate to prevent burnout and keep momentum going. Jam was talking about putting together some sort of toolkit for organising camps.

Have joined group, let me know how I can help out.

Yeah, Finn and Colin have done financials

jp.stacey's picture

Sorry if I suggested otherwise. I think Steven's aware of them having set up the account, though. The UKDA will at least let us make all these little things official, so we don't end up with two accounts!

anthonyalbertyn's picture

Hi Guys, there is an alternative proposal for a Drupal UK Society. I believe it is trying to achieve the same objectives but sounds a bit more solid to me. There is also a poll there (that also links to this proposal), so vote if you like. The post has mechanism on how you can get involved or put yourself forward. Here is the link: http://www.drupal.org.uk/drupal_uk_society/feedback
Thanks to everyone who got involved and re-kindled this idea!

Awesome

steven jones's picture

It's really great to see that this has sparked such discussion, glad to see that there is consensus that we need to get organised and that two serious proposals have been put forward.

Love it!

rachel_norfolk's picture

I like the sound of this proposal. I'm a great believer in the concept that it isn't a 'charged' service.

If I can help, please say!!

Rachel

Either option sounds good -

cferthorney's picture

Either option sounds good - the important thing as far as I am concerned is that there is something UK based and can help promote Drupal throughout the UK, and maybe even Europe. Just being a member through belonging to the UK group on GDO is a nice touch though. Especially as it is a cheap and easy way of getting involved with UK Drupal related activities. Which ever proposal goes forward I can't wait to get involved, and am happy to get involved assisting in setup etc if people want help.

Dave

--
David Thorne

I think that everyone would

steven jones's picture

I think that everyone would agree that we should have some kind of body that we can rally around to promote Drupal, however I think we need to be very prepared to admit that people are busy and don't have much spare time. We shouldn't take on too much to begin with, but grow slowly.

Complications?

willhallonline's picture

This refers to both the proposals. I am re-posting here to try to make both aware.

I am just wondering about two aspects of the proposal for society.
1. Subscription based.

If it is due to be subscription based, which I am not necessarily in opposition to, I fear that that may infringe on what the Drupal Association already does. The prices do appear above that of Drupal Association membership (I have converted to dollars for easier reference).

DA

Individual Membership $30
Organisation Membership $100

UK Drupal Soc

Individual ($23.45)
Professional ($70.42)
Agency 120 ($187.81)
Associated 250 ($391.23)
  1. Politics

If Scotland/Ireland already have "associations" and the UK Society intends "Drupal UK Society will aim to support local initiatives by the Scottish Drupal association", does this mean that control of that is assited by Drupal UK Soc? Also Ireland I believe contains both Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, therefore I assume it is actually Drupal GB Society (not UK). I believe that within Steven's proposal he suggested that Drupal Scotland and Ireland remain independent from UK Association?

  1. Website/segretation

Currently the website (drupal.org.uk) operates outside of Drupal (not within groups.drupal.org) and therefore doesn't contain the same restrains of Drupal (I believe that Robert privately runs it). Can I assume that ownership would pass to the Society? By utilising another website the UK Drupal Society does seem somewhat segregated from global drupal. Would we be looking for some official Drupal recognition?

I do like the idea of a governing and steering committee though. and feel that could possibly be brought into the Association idea?

Third option

stevepurkiss's picture

My comments from Robert's site as it seems you have to be logged in to see them:

Hi Robert,

  • 'Society' better reflects the collaborative nature of the Drupal community than 'Association'

    To me, 'Society' has much more of an elitist feeling about it, from my current impressions of various societies including having been privvy to a BCS award selection committee meeting when I was living out in Toronto.

    I also worry about consistency - Asssociation is used throughout the rest of the world and it strikes me as making things seem complicated from the outside even more complicated which is often seen as putting up unnecessary barriers to entry.
  • The Drupal Association prefers local organisations not to use the word 'Association' in their name as it's possible this may cause confusion.

    Actually I got completely the opposite impression, and in keeping local associations in line with the Drupal Association makes it a lot easier for us to work to create materials which can easily be rolled out, still retain the freedom to localise, and help other local groups set up easier and more quickly.

    I was impressed with what the Mozilla Foundation are doing in setting up local entities - at the moment we duplicate a lot of work once we're not doing PHP, we could do with applying some DRY principles to the other stuff we do as well as code.
  • Transfer all assets to the Drupal Association if wound down

    From my research over the years the "best" legal framework for a truly community-owned initiative is a CIC - Community Interest Company. This ensures all assets are owned by the community - a non-profit doesn't.
  • Better representation of real members of the community

    Could you please clarify how your approach better represents the real members, including what your definitiion of a real member is? There are many times in my life when I wouldn't have been able to afford to spend £15 on something like this but I sure was doing a hell of a lot of community work.

Lastly, I've only heard of this other proposal today, I thought we were working towards a solution and this comes as a surprise and says to me that the community will always have differing opinions and instead of how I feel at the moment, which is "being held to ransom until my 40th birthday on 27th July by having two hard-and-fast choices or nothing at all. How about a third way and we work out what the issues are and come to some kind of thing that covers everyone in the community and not just those who have worked out how to get cash out of it.

my 2p

Discoverability

steven jones's picture

Sorry that you've only just found out about these proposals today Steve, discoverability is a major problem with the Drupal community generally, I'm not sure how to solve it.

Regarding the naming of ...

Virbius's picture

I agree with you regarding the feel of the name Association over that of Society, but as long as it does what we want I'll call it whatever it finally gets called.

Richard

Six months on...

robcarr's picture

Seems we have the same sort of discussion as 6 months ago, but good to see things becoming a little more definite: http://groups.drupal.org/node/206303

The Scotland group is only an 'Association' from the bank's perspective; the DA would prefer us not use the term 'association' in any other context. The DA is the only Drupal association. And for us it's really just a mechanism to organise an annual Camp, and hopefully galvanise the local community for a few other events throughout the year.

We were successful in getting a community cultivation grant from the DA. We encourage everyone to join the DA, as it has implicitly provided us with seed funding. Although we now have a modest head of cash to support local DUGs organise a few small events, we could never have enough resource to provide the level of support and services that the DA offers.

I think Drupal Scotland and Ireland would remain as is (because it just works), and I believe the 'Drupal UK' proposal sprang from a need to provide a forum to coordinate events a little more across the UK, as well as foster some regional growth. Think of it as a loose-fitting, organic federation, rather than a rigid hierarchy.

Everyone who subscribes to the g.d.o /scotland group is a 'member' by default. Voting on issues is either through the committee of 7, or via a more open g.d.o discussion; anything big is saved for the AGM (ie, the Camp, so only Camp attendees can vote), which includes election of the committee for the next 12 months.

My view is keep any committee/admin overhead to a minimum and avoid an additional subscription. Encourage all people to join the DA. Unity is strength; fragmentation is weakness.

Unity is strength; fragmentation is weakness

stevepurkiss's picture

The D.A. has gone through considerable changes recently and I'm not so sure they are against using the word Association providing our base top-level goals are the same, and I haven't seen any "rogue" Associations being set up around the world which have anything else to do with anything apart from to help support the community.

The more I think about the loss of vote by not being a paid-up member of a society, the more I don't like the idea.

I think we should spend time working out what format will not exclude anyone from being part of the Drupal community and having a say in it.

Name

steven jones's picture

Back in January when we discussed this I reached out to Jacob Redding and he said that they'd prefer it if we didn't use the word 'Association' in our name. But, there are a number of regional associations that already do anyway, and I don't think there's going to be much confusion.

A name doesn't really matter, we can work that out later.

It is my intention to absolutely include as many people as possible in the discussion and whatever organisation we end up with.

differences

stevepurkiss's picture

There are major differences between an organisation where people have to pay to vote and one in which those active in the community are able to vote. It's a very small but significant difference.

I'm just a little miffed as I've just spent the last few months talking to as many members of the community as I can in order to represent their needs as best as possible within the structures we have built up over a period of years and have shown again and again to work. I feel as if we're now being introduced to a different structure and I'd like to know a lot more about it before committing to either one.

I don't think we should, in the light of things, put a time limit on the discussion, I'd rather find the best solution. As you say we need something lightweight to get started with, I feel today's events have completely changed the situation, and it's not something we should jump into lightly - we've been talking about this for months already so to be put a deadline on an entirely different outcome I'd not heard of just feels a little strange.

Apologies for being a little stressed about this in my tone, but y'know, I've put myself into a lot of debt this year and put my own business on hold whilst I was working towards what I thought was our common goals, to find out different is a little bit of a shock to the system for me.

Have to agree with Steve here

leontong.brightlemon's picture

I have to agree with you here Steve. In an age of "democracy", representation and enfranchisement it seems like a step backward to exclude voting rotes to all except paid up members of yet another group.

Furthermore - there is a huge difference in outreach between something that costs zero to join vs. any other price point (see Chris Anderson's book "Free").

These two arguments alone should be reason enough to strongly reconsider a subscription fee. There are other models for funding that could be explored.

How this proposal plays out

steven jones's picture

So, here's how I see this proposal being useful to members of the already fabulous Drupal UK community:

  1. A central place to go get help from people in the UK to organise events with a Drupal specific twist. I.e. How did the Manchester folks do those lanyard things? How do I get wifi set up at my venue if it doesn't have it? Where are the best places to advertise a UK Drupal event.
  2. An easy way to have a bank account for the various events that people want to run, without them all needing their own accounts.
  3. A platform to build on for future things that the community may want to do.

It's probably worth noting that while I want it to do this, there's no reason that it has to, if people want to do something else with it, then so be it.

Just a thought. I'll cross

adshill's picture

Just a thought. I'll cross post since we're now discussing the same thing in both places.

Why don't we hold a CHAIRED public meeting on IRC (or skype etc.) where the main topics at issue here are discussed. Many people are talking about being committed to this idea so to commit to a 1 or 2 hour session on a given date shouldn't be a problem.

The example agenda could be seen as:

Legal entity (Constituted Group, CLG, CIC)
Membership Structure (List location, Payment or not, committment)
Committee/Directors structure based on entity structure
How committee members are elected
Name (association/society etc.)

This way the minutes could be recorded and then we have one discussion from that point with clear deadlines. Also as I've written before, we should probably have a questionnaire that asks the main questions so that we have some quantitative data to base decisions on?

Let me know what you think.

Operations Director at Consult and Design International
Co-ordinator of Drupal North East
Global Volunteer Co-ordinator for DrupalCon

Fine by me

steven jones's picture

Sounds like it might be a useful avenue for further discussion, I'd be up for it.

Superb idea

cferthorney's picture

Let me know a date and time. Have you published this on the drupal.org.uk board - I think the UK Drupal Society and UK Drupal Association should be involved - you never know we may end up with a great framework out of this!

--
David Thorne

+1 for chaired public meeting

finn lewis's picture

That sounds like a great idea.
Have any open meetings happened yet, or are theses two proposals just the product of various smaller discussions?

None yet!

stevepurkiss's picture

Hi Finn,

No meeting yet!

If we do though it would be good to talk over other stuff as well, hard to get everyone together at the same time.

I'm running our BAD Ass Drupal Weekender to coincide with the Brighton Digital Festival and the next Drupal Global Training Day (GTD - love it!) on 14/15/16 September.

Just had our first "official" conf call meeting of the marketing committee and am planning a site to get people all over the world to show something Drupal to at least one other person (preferably more!) on 14 September and spread the Drupal love - would be great to update you all on what's been going on and get some ideas together.

We recorded our marketing meeting - highly recommend it if possible. Doug Vann's been using google hangouts for training etc. and said they were good - anyone used them yet?

I was just having the idea

adshill's picture

I was just having the idea and hadn't got any further than that - I guess the next steps are:

1) Identifying a Chairperson
2) Setting a date
3) Agreeing on a venue (probably drupal-uk on IRC?)

There have been a couple of people mentioning in other avenues that maybe a "live" meeting is not so useful but I really feel like it could help move some things forward and give as many people as possible the opportunity to chime in. Not sure it should be a decision making process but more an opinion sharing, followed by publishing of the conversation, these threads and finally a short survey of some kind I think it will be possible to cover as many avenues as possible and get real representation to influence how to move forward.

I realise a lot of talk/work has gone on before so this is just a proposal but I think it would help the slightly "split" feeling I'm getting right now and I think much of that is due to conversations going on in different parts of the country and being fed-back individually instead of one conversation.

Operations Director at Consult and Design International
Co-ordinator of Drupal North East
Global Volunteer Co-ordinator for DrupalCon

Actually, I forgot to mention

adshill's picture

Actually, I forgot to mention that it probably makes sense to set the agenda too as I made quite a rush version before! :)

Operations Director at Consult and Design International
Co-ordinator of Drupal North East
Global Volunteer Co-ordinator for DrupalCon

Glad to see action

instanceofjamie's picture

I'm personally very glad that you've started this thread, and would be very keen to offer some help (or at least opinions :P)

Running a group can be a bit haphazard and sometimes it feels like there's nowhere to go for support. Having yet another site to visit/join for me at least would be a right pain, so I'm happy to see a proposal to keep any future UK organisation on *.drupal.org. Paywalling an open source community is also pretty anathema to my own ethics, but I do appreciate that for some things costs need to be covered.

If there's a date/time for a public meeting suggested, I'd like to join in if possible.

Public meeting / org website

anthonyalbertyn's picture

I am also in favour of a public meeting to consolidate and move forward.

Regarding the home of the new association (whatever it is called), it might be better for it to have it's own website. that way we can build functionality that we may not otherwise have the power to do don drupal.org. But for maximum reach, I can understand that it may need a website and a group on drupal.org.

leontong.brightlemon's picture

A cross post from http://www.drupal.org.uk/drupal_uk_society/feedback#comment-4342:

Hi Robert

Thanks for this thread and related discussions (and to Steven Jones et. al. also).

An open, transparent and collaborative UK Drupal Society / Association has been a topic of discussion both offline and online for some time now. Personally, I would welcome its formation and be very willing to support and contribute time and resource - and I know of a number of other UK Drupal organisations and individuals who would feel the same way and whose voice ought to be represented.

The Drupal community in the UK contains people with a broad and deep range of skills - and this ought to be utilised by including as many of them as possible within a representative body, society or association.

However, I would suggest that it would be useful to take a step back and address two fundamental questions for this process:

1) The Aims of the organisation should probably by higher level than the initial post (http://www.drupal.org.uk/drupal_uk_society/feedback), and address concepts such as to:

i) represent, support, promote and set professional standards for practitioners of Drupal - be they companies, partnerships or individuals;

ii) engage, attract, and teach potential users of Drupal/future Drupal project stakholders;

iii) partner with relevant organisations and bodies across sectors, technology or geography.

Without wanting to be overly critical, what you currently have as aims are more akin to a subset of objectives to achieve the above (but I realise the inital post was a starter for ten - and hence this is a constructive contribution not a criticism).

2) The Benefits of membership - for all potential members will need to be fleshed out. A whole lot more. There are a wide range of benefits on offer from most societies and associations which charge a subscription - and so I would raise a concern as to whether charging a fee is even appropriate at this early stage if it (a) goes against (1)(ii) and (b) there is not enough tangibile benefit to warrant it.

On reflection I do have to say that I have a slight reservation towards creating an archaic, stuffy structure to govern something that is modern, innovative and fluid. However, if done in the right way, the plusses will inevitably outway the minuses.

Regards

Leon

My thoughts

timdeeson's picture

(Cross posted on drupal.org.uk)

A few thoughts -

• Because the organisation will have to handle money to do anything useful (contract to organise an event for example), I can't see how not becoming a formal financial / legal entity can be avoided. Whether it is a CIC / CGL / something else, should be reviewed carefully.

• As Leon Tong said, I think agreeing the high level goals / principles is important because any subsequent decisions become nearly impossible otherwise.

• Some sort of (low) membership fee makes sense to me as it's going be hard to bootstrap otherwise. My understanding of the DA's finances are that DrupalCon's generate most of the 'profit' they use to undertake other activities. Depending on the organisation's goals it may be that events are designed to be break-even but there will be some operating costs / activities outside of this that need some sort of funding (accounting fees, sponsoring a stand at a UK Symfony conference - ideas off the top of my head).

• It's obviously an controversial topic without a 'right' answer. It's also a topic that has been debated at length and then died (both very recently and numerous times before). Some sort of framework and timeboxing I think is helpful to focus debate and ensure we don't lose momentum, the risk otherwise is a 1000 comment thread at stalemate with everyone disenfranchised.

I think the UK community would benefit from a UK Drupal organisation existing (in whatever form) by giving extra life to the UK community, it doesn't 'control' anyone's behaviour, prevent them from carrying on as they do now or the Drupal project in any sense. It would have to go very badly wrong to get close to doing any harm, particularly if operated in a completely open, democratic and transparent way. It not existing however will mean continued missed opportunities for events and activities.

• Consolidating the debate in one place or the other would definitely remove one challenge from the conversation!

Thanks

Tim Deeson

indeed, but a couple of thoughts

finn lewis's picture

Hi Tim.

I like what you said, but have a couple of thoughts:

  • Because the organisation will have to handle money to do anything useful (contract to organise an event for example), I can't see how not becoming a formal financial / legal entity can be avoided.

We have already set up a bank account for the Oxford DrupalCamp without a formal constitution or legal entity, and other community groups and indeed software associations have set up and successfully traded in this way for many years, so I don't see that as a fait accompli. The bank account was set up with a name that would allow other regional groups to use it for their events, while awaiting a formal national organisation to take ownership of the account. There are other reasons why a legal entity would be a good logical conclusion, the main one in my mind being liability.

  • Consolidating the debate in one place or the other would definitely remove one challenge from the conversation!

I agree that bringing the conversation to one place would remove a hurdle, but (as was discussed tonight at the Oxford Drupal User Group) the fact that it is being actively discussed in two places does highlight the fact that some people mainly use groups.drupal.org, some mainly use drupal.org.uk, and many people who use one are actually unaware of the other! So it is potentially a good thing that we are discussing it on both platforms: it reaches more people.

This perhaps highlights the fractured/segmented/discombobulated nature of the UK drupal community/communities which is something a national association/society might help to coalesce.

Hi Finn On the legal org

timdeeson's picture

Hi Finn

On the legal org point, to me, the risk of a bank account without an organisation behind is that it makes governance very hard. The person(s) with the effective final say on some issues become those who can access the account and continuity can become an issue. There is also the liability issue you mention.

As you say, perfectly possible to achieve things without it but it could bring some headaches and risks at the scale that a ~'DA UK' could reach, revenue it could generate and the issues it may have to deal with.

As you say, at this point the fact that everyone is aware is of more benefit than the downside of the fragmented conversation!

Cheers

Tim

UK

diarmy's picture

Hello Steven

I have a question regarding your point about geographic scope. You say with regards to Scotland and NI that 'we aren't trying to usurp them or take them over'. Why then do you propose that this be called a UK body? Wouldn't Drupal Association of England and Wales be more consistent with your proposed target area?

Many thanks

Diarmuid

I'm glad someone asked this

adshill's picture

I'm glad someone asked this question as I was wondering what the idea was here. Given that there is already an NI and Scottish Association, personally my thoughts would be what those two associations would like from a UK Association (if anything).

For example, it could be that the NI and Scottish Associations feed into the UK Association by having a garaunteed 2 representatives each on the board - this would also mean that the UK Association would have an initial group of people experienced in developing an Association.

The other option could be as you say to set up a separate "England and Wales" Association. If this was the case I'd be interested in how the three could work together in order to ensure that the UK does have some kind of unified voice.

Being from the North of England one of the difficulties for me has been that getting involved in "UK" Drupal things means generally travelling to London. This also worries me a bit in terms of true representation and brings up a question of how it can be ensured. Could there be a representative on the board of each UK/English/Welsh region? For England this would mean the following 9 regions:

East Midlands
East of England
Greater London
North East England
North West England
South East England
South West England
West Midlands
Yorkshire and the Humber

Just throwing things out there right now - I don't have a clear opinion on how to deal with these things but representation has to be achieved, and when it comes to Scotland and NI I would suggest that depends on those two groups coming forward and saying how they would like to be involved?

Operations Director at Consult and Design International
Co-ordinator of Drupal North East
Global Volunteer Co-ordinator for DrupalCon

Politics (a difficult game)

willhallonline's picture

I had already mentioned I think about how politics becomes very interesting, especially when attempting to not disenfranchise people. I think that having representatives from each area may happen in a committee may happen but it can't be a requirement. As a comparison:
*East of England (which is mainly actually meaning Cambridge) has 71 members on http://groups.drupal.org/east-of-england
*London has 717 members (more than UK) on http://groups.drupal.org/london
(and some are members of both??)

It calls into question voting restrictions (London having 10x the members of East of England) all of which I think most people are dead against so I would just think that the committee has to be on who volunteer and who are voted in.

With regards to the Scotland & NI (which I thought was covered by Northern Ireland & Republic of Ireland in http://groups.drupal.org/ireland) I would assume that they would kind of remain as separate entities, although I have no clear answer for this.

Yes its true - a requirement

adshill's picture

Yes its true - a requirement would be difficult, however I still think representation is important :) If the UK Drupal Association becomes a group of people from London and the South its not going to inspire people up here to get involved! But of course the desire to be involved and commitment levels are much more important.

But actually the question of the name of the organisation (UK over England and Wales) is much more relevant and important. We voted no to devolution so I should refrain from my Northern England feelings of insecurity :)

Operations Director at Consult and Design International
Co-ordinator of Drupal North East
Global Volunteer Co-ordinator for DrupalCon

Number of members / Cambridge

anthonyalbertyn's picture

East of England (which is mainly actually meaning Cambridge) - The history here is that when setup the group I wanted to setup a Cambridge Group, but the moderator said the area was too small to warrant a group. I then tried East Anglia but that was too small too so I just called it East of England! We now have a Norwich group and others probably to follow so at some point I will try and get it renamed to Cambridge :-)

has 71 members on http://groups.drupal.org/east-of-england - yes indeed, however most our members are not on groups.drupal.org. Most of our members (close to 400) are on drupal.org.uk and almost 200 on meetup.com/drupalcambs. Yes, people are on multiple groups, so I am in favour of 'one person one vote'

Scotland and Ireland are both

greg.harvey's picture

Scotland and Ireland are both recognised already by the Drupal Association as 'official' national associations, so I guess they would almost certainly remain separate. I don't know if NI people are happy to join the Ireland group. One of our guys works in NI, I'll ask his opinion...

Holiday

steven jones's picture

I'm on holiday, camping, for the next two weeks, so my ability to discuss and push this further is very limited until the 22nd July.

Updates

steven jones's picture

Hi everyone,

A little update from me: We had a nice chat at Drupalcon and didn't decide anything, but there were lots of people there and hopefully we can progress the discussions in an open and transparent manner on the interwebs in due months.

To aid that I'm trying to compile a list of people that organise Drupal 'themed' events in England & Wales, if that's you or you know someone who does, can you make sure that they are on this list please?

http://groups.drupal.org/node/251268

Drupal in Newcastle upon Tyne

webdesignnewcastle's picture

Sorry new here, but is their a group in Newcastle upon Tyne. Can't find one. Their must be a group.

Yep:

steven jones's picture

Yep: http://www.drupalnortheast.org.uk/

Sign up to the newsletter and they tend to email out about events.

Thanks Steven! We hold a

adshill's picture

Thanks Steven!

We hold a monthly event on the last Wednesday of the month in Newcastle at Campus North. The website doesn't get updated much recently (we're working on it!) but you can find us on meetup.com here:

http://www.meetup.com/DrupalNorthEast/events/224934380/

Hope you can make it next week when we'll have an intro to Drupal 8.

Operations Director at Consult and Design International
Co-ordinator of Drupal North East
Global Volunteer Co-ordinator for DrupalCon

United Kingdom

Group notifications

This group offers an RSS feed. Or subscribe to these personalized, sitewide feeds:

Hot content this week