Unofficial Drupal Roadmap

Since there has been lots of dicussion on why Drupal should or shouldnt have a roadmap, lets combine the power of those who think we should offer some form of an unofficial roadmap and build it right here.

Sessions on Drupal.org and the Community Wanted For Drupalcon 2008

mpare's picture
public
mpare - Sat, 2008-01-19 00:15

My name is Matthew Pare and I'm a Co-Chair for the "Community and Core" track for Drupalcon Boston 2008. Over the last couple of weeks we have been planning and brainstorming to make Drupalcon Boston 2008 the best Drupalcon to date! One of our recommended track session topics is "Drupal.org and the Community" and since your viewing this post on the "Unofficial Drupal Roadmap" groups.drupal.org group I thought you would be excellent candidates for submitting sessions on the topic.


Wiki based on battle plans?

ChrisKennedy's picture
public
ChrisKennedy - Sat, 2007-09-08 22:01

What about implementing a roadmap as a wiki based on Drupal 6 battle plans? Or now we might want to shift to Drupal 7.

It would group the features/bugs by categories and include a list of contributors willing to work on each item. No item can be listed without having at least one volunteer interested in working on it. That way we won't waste time with items that no one is interested in, but people can get a better idea of what is planned in the future.


devel list post

pwolanin's picture
public
pwolanin - Sat, 2007-02-03 03:30

I think this recent post on the devel list by chx would make a reasonable start for a roadmap:

http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/development/2007-February/022353.html


Defining a roadmap for i18n in Drupal 6 core

Gábor Hojtsy's picture
public
Gábor Hojtsy - Thu, 2006-11-30 22:12

Although actual implementation details are still forming around the pieces we are trying to implement for the Drupal 6 core i18n feature set (which will get shipped with Drupal 6 hopefully), we should define some goals which we aim for, so we see the target. Unless we work in the same direction, there will be no useable consistent i18n solution in Drupal core for people to build their sites on. So what is possible to accomplish in the Drupal 6 timeframe, and what will only be possible to implement in contrib modules?


What do we need?

michaelfavia's picture
public
michaelfavia - Fri, 2006-11-17 16:19

I am willing to dedicate some real time and purpose to such a project. We will need a bit more organization form the top down though. I'm joining a couple of the mailing lists towards that end and i would really like to get the ball rolling on this. I use drupal privately and professionally and both would benefit immensely from this project. While I would love for such a project to be self sustaining (wiki or otherwise) i think it will require some early heavy seeding to get things going. Perhaps integrating "development time frame" as a field into project_issue module would also provide some structure to help make the "feature improvements" process more organic.


No activity - what do we do?

Gunnar Langemark's picture
public
Gunnar Langemark - Sat, 2006-07-08 08:23
Kill the group
63% (5 votes)
Wait for someone to care enough?
38% (3 votes)
Total votes: 8

Right then, first questions

Bèr Kessels@drupal.org's picture
public
Bèr Kessels@dru... - Wed, 2006-05-17 08:20

Should it be a wiki roadmap, or maintained by one person?
How finegrained do we want to see the roadmap?
Can we facilitate contrib developers with roadmap features?
Do we need a roadmap module?


Right then!

Gunnar Langemark's picture
public
Gunnar Langemark - Thu, 2006-05-11 19:00

Let's make that Roadmap..


Since there has been lots of dicussion on why Drupal should or shouldnt have a roadmap, lets combine the power of those who think we should offer some form of an unofficial roadmap and build it right here.

Syndicate content