Please weigh in on giving more people the permission to give people git vetted user status

We encourage users to post events happening in the community to the community events group on https://www.drupal.org.
mlncn's picture

In particular, deputizing kattekrab— or proposing another person or another approach.

https://www.drupal.org/node/2736981 => Give kattekrab the power to give people the power to approve project applications

But i'm three hours into a stint of just approving RTBC projects (and not yet halfway done?), which should never be our backlog, and after Damien McKenna made a huge dent in that queue yesterday.

Comments

I would like to see this

frob's picture

I would like to see this system be more of an automated peer review system.

Some people (agreed more than there are now) can just do it, other wise, a vote of confidence from a number of other git vetter users can let someone pass. Just throwing an idea out there.