I know I am weighing in on a sensitive topic. I found that out earlier today with my poorly received attempt at a humorous blog post entitled "Decapitate Drupal, please". I was unprepared for the negative response I received (though I did get some positive response as well). Someone rightly pointed out that Drupal Planet was not the right place for the discussion and suggested I come here. So, here I am.
The event that got me thinking about this issue went as follows: I will preface this by saying that I have no complaints about the Drupal update process. Many people thought I was complaining about that, but I wasn't. I think it is great. We did an update on a customer site yesterday and accidentally over-wrote the favicon we designed for them with the Drupalicon. We didn't notice. They noticed in the morning and we replaced it with the right one. No big deal and, yes, it was our error. We'll survive.
The interesting part came in the message from the customer. The customer thought perhaps they had been hacked as their icon had been replaced "with picture of a kid wearing a dunce cap". A dunce cap is an old grade school method of shaming kids who are not trying, in the opinion of the teacher. the teacher would make the kid wear a pointy hat. The hat was called a "dunce cap".
I believe this perception by my customer, who had never seen the Drupalicon, is of great value. I believe it would be shared by many people on first encountering the Drupalicon, which is in effect the Drupal "brand". Many people might not come to the conclusion that the Drupalicon is a kid in a dunce cap, but I assure you they would also not think of it as a professional logo. It is not. It is somewhat juvenile and hacker-ish. This does no good for the Drupal community. It means the Drupal community is succeeding in spite of the brand, not because of it. The brand does not have its shoulder to the wheel. It is a flat tire. Of course, there is no need to take my word for this. I have a proposition.
The d.o. redesign presents a great opportunity to talk about the Drupal brand. What is a brand? A brand is a customer experience represented by a collection of images and ideas; often, it refers to a symbol such as a name, logo, slogan, and design scheme [wikipedia]. We navigate our world to a certain extent by virtue of the syntax and semantics of brands. We also evaluate the viability of transactions and projects based on the brands associated with the participants in the transaction or effort.
Regardless of what we might wish to be the case, the brand does have an effect. First impressions are very important. In the course of negotiations and planning, a negative brand expereince can form a background noise and have a detrimental impact on your overall effort. "They seem good, but what's up with that logo?" It is something people take seriously on a very deep level because the mechanism of brands is so deeply ingrained in our psyches.
Now, it may be that I am just talking out of my assumptions and not the facts. What to do?
Rebrand Drupal.
I suggest that as an open community we put everything - even the name Drupal - up for evaluation. Don't be scared. re-naming projects like this one happens all the time, and if done right, it works well. I would like to begin the discussion by proposing a process.
-
Ask - survey a range of people including branding professionals, Drupal stakeholders, Dupal consulting and integration companies and the general Drupal community. Ask them all about the Drupal brand and see what we get back. My company hosts online surveys as one of our service offerings, and I would be happy to offer the facility in support of the effort. I will also commit to leverage my relationships with branding pros to get them to help design the survey so the information we get back is as useful as possible.
-
Evaluate - Allow the community to digest the results. It may be that no action is required, but I would find this surprising. I predict a rebrand will be suggested, perhaps not as fundamental as renaming the project, but that should be an on-the-table option, for the sake of the health of the community and project. I believe I read somewhere that Dries is calling his new Drupal-based installation project Carbon, so it seems that Drupal can go forward under another name.
-
Rebrand - the branding process as practiced in the commercial sphere may not be appropriate for an open-source, open community project like Drupal. I suggest we be as innovative as Drupal has always been and research and develop an "Open Branding Process" based on commercial branding but embodying the values of openness. The outcome should be an "Open Brand". I have seen some discussion online about the characteristics of an "Open Brand" and they mirror the general values of the open-source community and the various discussions going on about "openness" that have emerged from the growing global trend in this direction.
In my mind, the open branding process would differ from the commercial branding process in interesting and significant ways. There is a very ambiguous and blurred relationship between consumers, producers and other stakeholders in the totality of the Drupalsphere. This blending and intermingling has been well-documented in publications like the cluetrain manifesto and others. An opportunity exists for Drupal and its community to break more new ground in the way we do this. I would be very excited to be a part of the process. There are obviously energetic people fully engaged in this process and I am happy to lend my energy on this topic should people see it as a viable and desirable part of the process.
The opportunity seems to be here with the discussions and planning around the d.o. redesign. If I get a positive response to this post, I will put more effort into planning the process, and the first stage will be general approval (by the Drupal Association or whoever is required to be party to the decision) of the process involved in deciding if a rebrand is required or desirable.
Let's do something new and original...and open...by creating a new Drupal brand to launch with the redesigned drupal.org.

Comments
Evan, are you in Boston for
Evan, are you in Boston for Drupalcon? I would love to meet with you and anyone else to talk about this while so many stakeholders are still in town. My posts over the years have hinted at similar thoughts and feelings regarding Drupal's identity, but your post is much more to the point. Thank you for writing this here.
(The name Carbon, by the way -- like Spokes --- is drawn from Jay Batson's love of cycling.)
I wasn't able to attend
However, I am seriously motivated on this since I feel there is an opportunity and the time is right. I believe it is an important issue. Time to get Drupal's brand working as hard as the rest of the team and community.
Saw your blogpost in my
Saw your blogpost in my feedreader and found a deleted post. I'm glad to see you repost your thoughts here.
Please crosspost this to the Drupal marketing group: http://groups.drupal.org/drupal-marketing and read up on the infos there as well. (sign up for the group and edit this post to belong to the marketing audience, too)
You could bring in some much needed expertise and the open process you are suggesting sounds interesting and fair.
There are a lot of loose strands all over the place (marketing materials, slogans, seo, case studies, logo…). To take it to the next level some kind of process like this should take place, I'd love to see what you think such a plan looks like and help out where I can.
+1 from me.
Thanks for the +1
I will cross-post it at the marketing group.
Short answer
Don't sell Drupal to clients. Drupal (and it's open source-ness) is a feature. Make an install profile / distribution, and brand it. Everyone gets their cake and gets to eat it too.
See Ubercart for one example of a "not Drupal" distribution.
I find it highly unlikely that the "drop" will go away.
Free as in Liberty
(part of my comments copied from the marketing cross post)
You know - you are completely free to go right ahead and rename and re-brand Drupal to whatever you like and sell that to you clients instead of the alien-child-wearing-a-dunce-cap-who-plumbs-communities-brand. In fact anyone can do that.
snip
Anyway - I really hope that Association funds aren't spent on a branding exercise for Drupal. I also hope that not too many person hours are wasted on this discussion. Yes pay an information architect to re-do drupal.org. Yes, help make drupal.org meet the needs of new visitors and better communication what Drupal can do for them. When those jobs are complete THEN see if you need to re-brand, re-name, or re-position Drupal.
See the rest of my thoughts at http://groups.drupal.org/node/9517#comment-29723
andre
I love the discussion
but can we please consolidate discussion over at this thread...
http://groups.drupal.org/node/9517
I understand you were crossposting but a more efficient way of crossposting is to subscribe to the groups that you want to post to and then categorize the post into those groups this way its one post and one discussion.
-Jacob Redding
-Jacob Redding
Thanks for raising this issue
I love just about everything about Drupal but that creepy "logo" thing is an awkward, amateur effort that is completely at odds with the quality and professionalism of the software. I'm not sure that a major rebranding exercise is needed, though. Just keep the outline of the drop shape and get rid of the face. That would be clean, simple, and maintain continuity. It would also restore the sense of a "droplet" which is completely lost when you add those weird facial features.
Distributions
Druplicon is something you learn to like. Too much has been built around it and it won't go away soon. Most rebranding you can get is a logo polishment. It was done once.
I think that if you do want rebranding, distributions is the way to go. Take blogs as example. We know that Wordpress is the big leader in blogging sphere, for instance, and we know that branding play an important role there. We couldn't however, change all Drupal branding to please this specific public. The solution would be a blogging distribution, with a blogger-friendly logo and name. A targeted brand. Same is valid for other fields, such as brochure websites, ecommerce, etc.
Huh?
Huh? I agree with everything else you say, though.