Posted by omar on November 24, 2010 at 3:45pm
Start:
2010-12-01 18:00 America/Montreal Event type:
User group meeting
So what's been going on in the community recently? As a community, do we have any messages we want to bring to the Salon du Logiciel Libre du Québec?
And, by the way, where are the DrupalCamp videos? Where will they be hosted? How much surplus do we have from the camp and what do we do with it?
I hereby invite you all over to Koumbit's offices to discuss these and other issues.
Omar

Comments
I'll be there. It would be
I'll be there. It would be nice to have the videos up and some news on the site pretty soon.
I'll bring a proposal for the
I'll bring a proposal for the DrupalCamp video site to the meeting. (Think http://www.ted.com/talks)
We'll need the community's commitment to make it work, last meeting barely anyone showed up.
Can you change the date
Omar, can you change the date? December 1st is the only date I cannot go.
Basically we need to setup a non-profit organization. I would suggest creating a Montreal-based user group.
Reference:
http://groups.drupal.org/node/88844
Il a été discuté hier du besoin d'avoir une association formelle pour prendre en charge les prochains DrupalCamps, et qui sait, DrupalCon 2012. Ce comité n'est pas strictement lié au prochain Camp, mais comme il en a été question, je l'ajoute ici. Ce comité ne sera pas actif avant la fin du DrupalCamp Montréal 2010.
/* http://www.xmacinfo.com */
Ugh. Scheduling...
...is always hard because there is always somebody who can't show up.
Andrew stated that Tuesday's were no good for him; I am not available Monday; so that would leave Wednesday (that you don't like), Thursday or Friday. If you can get those who already confirmed to confirm for one of the other days, I guess we can change.
Otherwise, my feeling is that if you have to miss it, no biggy... there will be other meetings. In any case, I don't see us taking a decision at this meeting with respect to whether or not we setup a non-profit for the local Drupal community.
Ciao for now.
Omar
Thursday is good for me, but
Thursday is good for me, but I can't friday.
W/T/F
W/T/F work for me. If we don't find consensus swiftly on another day next week i think it's best that we stick with Monday. A meeting needs to be held ASAP.
Availabilities
@omar: I am available each night during the week, including Wednesdays. I just can't make it for the one on December 1st. :-)
If we change the date, I should be able to attend. If it is impossible to change the date, well, there will always be other opportunities to meet and discuss.
/* http://www.xmacinfo.com */
We already had a
We already had a post-DrupalCamp meeting, and very few people actually showed up. It was, for the most part, a severe waste of time. I won't be able to attend this one.
Once all the sponsors have paid, I will post my report here. The most likely scenario at this point is the surplus funds will be donated to the Drupal Association, and will be earmarked for future use by the Montreal Drupal user group. This was discussed at length by those who showed up at the meeting on Nov 8th and I've been working with Jacob Redding and Daniel Finnerty to finalize the details of such transaction.
Setting up a non-profit is not an option in the short term. Such a process would take 12-18 months to bootstrap, according to Andrew Lindsay. Personally, I don't ever see it as being a viable option (too much overhead), but those who really want to pursue it should go right ahead.
Sponsors who have yet to pay:
Setting up a non-profit takes a short time
I don't know where the figures 6-month or 12-18-month comes from to setup a non-profit.
Setting up a non-profit takes less than a day. What takes a long time are discussions and meetings, which we already do each year anyway.
/* http://www.xmacinfo.com */
Getting aproved by the
Getting aproved by the government for a non-profit takes 4 months and UP TO 18 months. It's pretty rare though to take it 18 months.
8 months in my experience
Foulab took 8 months plus to get government approved to the best of my memory. We weren't able to open a bank account and hold onto money officially until that was sorted.
Well, for a user group is days, not months
Looks like your non-profits were all incorporated. This is indeed a challenge. The more complex an organization, the longer it'll take to setup.
Well, this is not what we are looking for. We need to setup a small association for a small user group doing business in Québec only. And it takes days only to setup. And less than a day to do the paperwork.
ENTREPRISES À BUT NON LUCRATIF
Personne morale sans but lucratif
http://www.formulaire.gouv.qc.ca/cgi/affiche_doc.cgi?query=&dossier=1302...
Association non personnifiée en vertu du Code civil du Québec :
THIS IS THIS NON-PROFIT FORM THAT I SUGGEST.
Groupement :
http://www.formulaire.gouv.qc.ca/cgi/affiche_doc.cgi?query=&dossier=4688...
COOPÉRATIVE
/* http://www.xmacinfo.com */
Great, except...
This part scares me a little bit:
One of the major attractions of incorporation is to absolve shareholders (members) from liability in the event that something goes South with the organization. This could be anything... someone could slip and fall leaving a meetup and sue, who knows, it could be anything.
It's too bad that incorporating is so dead simple, all it takes is $200, and would get us the protection from liability. We would end up paying $2000 per year for professional services, but the real trouble lies in how we distribute share ownership initially and as time goes on. Membership-driven share ownership is just not baked in when profits are involved.
Unfortunately, the member-driven solution you are proposing may only be of marginal benefit if we're still personally liable for the actions of the group. Just out of curiosity, what kind of annual overhead does running one of these organizations involve, Jacques?
I apologize for misstating your timeline figures, Andrew. 8 months is still a pretty long time for a volunteer organization to hold such consistant focus like that, though.
Of course, administrators must be liable
Of course, administrators must be liable in an association since this is the only way to make sure that there won't be any abuse. If we want to have all the benefits of a non-profit association, all the administrators must be responsible.
This is also why that type of association do not require any annual professional services. I've been involved in many associations, and one even had a budget of $30,000 $ per year. And at no occasions any professional services were required.
As for liabilities in case someone hurts himself at an event, the association can buy insurances. For example, when the $30,000/year association organized music shows, the association had to make sure that they had a valid insurance (and various municipal permits).
A small association is not required to sell memberships, sell shares or require any personal money. All that is required a people who want to organize activities together, responsibly. However, to make things really simple for us, we might consider selling memberships at, let's say, on dollar per year, or even five. These members would be able to elect the executive committee each year in a general assembly.
Once again, I'd be happy to discuss all this in a meeting, but December 1st is the only night I cannot attend. :-(
/* http://www.xmacinfo.com */
We clearly need a thread for this...
... but can talk about it at the next meeting.
My $0.02 worth is that while non-profits can be setup relatively quickly, there is a lot of overhead and it is only worth it when the mission of the organisation is clear and the legal entity is a requirement to carrying out this mission.
I have yet to clearly understand what the purpose of a local non-profit would even be, or if the legal entity is necessary to achieve said goals. I have even less of a clue how this entity would/should be governed, etc. IMO, these issues need a lot of clarification before we can even evaluate if there is sufficient political and logistical support for actually setting up a non-profit. So given that we don't, IMHO, really know what we are talking about at this point, discussions regarding implementation and viability seem premature.
xmacinfo, as always I am open and interested by these discussions/ideas, but I think that you should start from the assumption that people don't have a clue why a non-profit might be of interested to them... much less why it might be worth their investing time (and money?) into creating one.
Omar
why a non-profit
@omar: I am always interested to discuss this also. But I cannot make it Dec 1st.
/* http://www.xmacinfo.com */