Posted by yoroy on April 1, 2011 at 11:15am
Yay or nay? I think nay because premature. Thoughts?
Triggered by the request for http://groups.drupal.org/springboard for http://drupal.org/sandbox/pcave/1112252
Yay or nay? I think nay because premature. Thoughts?
Triggered by the request for http://groups.drupal.org/springboard for http://drupal.org/sandbox/pcave/1112252
Comments
I say nay, but not because of
I say nay, but not because of the associated project status:
If they do build a solid discussion around the topic of the springboard platform then it makes sense to me for them to have their own group.
knaddison blog | Morris Animal Foundation
Nay to allowing new groups for each sandbox project
Can you imagine just how much effort, maintenance, and volume would be generated by allowing a new group application for each and every hair-brained sandbox that comes along? I mean, sure, it sounds cool now, but having the free-tagging system floodded by thousands of tags that only make sense to a throw-away codebase, g.d.o calendar permeated by event nodes where two devs are getting together to talk about their latest commits, and so on?
Joel Farris | my 'certified to rock' score
Transparatech
http://transparatech.com
619.717.2805