This is an open meeting for any and all interested in helping push ahead the wiki-based planning process for organizing and holding the first Drupal Association elections of at large directors. See the wiki page for details. Thanks for all the great ideas and research so far!
Call time
Date: Wednesday, Jan. 4th 2012
Time: 20:00 UTC
That's:
- 12 noon PST in North America
- 2 PM in Tegucigalpa
- 3PM EST in North America
- 9 PM in Rome
- 7 AM Jan. 5th in Sydney Australia
IRC
#drupal-association-townhall
Pads for wiki editing
- Edit the existing wiki and note meeting attendees: http://lullapad.com/5TCVHgaCYV
- Draft a new wiki capturing recommendations: http://lullapad.com/QTSSqPCvVu
Phone
First dial the appropriate country phone number listed below then enter the participant access code 883587.
If you want to participate but don't have free long distance calling or are otherwise unable to connect via one of these numbers, please contact Nedjo and we'll work something out.
![]() |
Australia* | +61 1300 781 250 |
![]() |
Austria | +43 (0) 1 265 05 60 |
![]() |
Canada | +1 559 546 1333 |
![]() |
Czech Republic | +420 225 989 115 |
![]() |
France | +33 (0) 1 8014 0690 |
![]() |
Germany | +49 (0) 355 475 4400 |
![]() |
Japan | +81 3 5050 5070 |
![]() |
Netherlands | +31 (0) 20 322 3020 |
![]() |
Nigeria | +234 1 667 0007 |
![]() |
Portugal | +351 21005 1184 |
![]() |
Romania | +40 317 807 040 |
![]() |
South Africa | +27 87 825 0140 |
![]() |
Spain | +34 91 119 6730 |
![]() |
Switzerland | +41 (0) 44 595 9050 |
![]() |
United Kingdom | +44 (0) 784 843 2915 |
![]() |
United States | +1 559 546 1301 |
Relevant background information on Drupal Association governance: http://groups.drupal.org/node/199613.
Aims
- Identify gaps in the current options identified. Where is more research needed? What hasn't yet been considered?
- Draft a new wiki page capturing the current recommendations based on options identified in the wiki page.
- Identify work needed to facilitate the planning process. Examples might include: Put up demo site of distinct voting systems.
- Begin to fill out questions to be asked of candidates.
- Revisit and revise the elections timeline.
Procedure
- Quick round of intros. E.g., each meeting participant says where they're calling from and, in a sentence, one thing about themselves that they think other call participants don't know.
- Roles needed for the meeting:
- Facilitator (Nedjo)
- Recorder: ensure meeting outcomes are documented in the pad, to be copied to wiki. Empowered to interrupt at any time to ensure that discussion is properly recorded.
- Timekeeper: keep us moving along. Empowered to interrupt at any time to remind of time or move on to next subject.
- Process monitor: ensure there is equal space for all meeting participants. Empowered to interrupt at any time to flag communication problems or conflict and suggest remedies, e.g., the current speaker wraps up.
- At the beginning of the meeting, Nedjo will copy the current planning wiki into a pad where it can be simultaneously edited by all participants and create a new wiki in a 2nd pad to begin to draft the recommendations.
- Review each section in the current wiki. Identify:
- Where is more information needed?
- What actions are needed to address information gaps?
- Is there an emerging consensus on one or more options? If so, copy these options to the recommendations wiki.
We'll have only an hour and a lot to cover. This won't be a good time to debate in depth the intricacies of eligibility requirements or voting systems. We may, however, begin to distill from the existing wiki the outlines of a proposal that we can present back to the community for further review before it's presented for ratification to the board.
Apologies for the short notice in scheduling the meeting--it's the only time slot that works for the people who responded to a poll of potential meeting times.
Thanks all!

Comments
I was waiting to find out my
I was waiting to find out my meeting schedule tomorrow once I was back at work before replying, but noon PST = team standup for me tomorrow, so I won't be able to join. I'm sure you'll have an interesting conversation though, will keep an eye out for notes.
Aha, it has been changed to
Aha, it has been changed to the 4th, that may just work, I'll make it as long as I don't have any client meetings booked!
My current concerns are (not
My current concerns are (not sure if we can cover them all tomorrow in an hour):
There's been next to no discussion around the nomination process. Is it total free-for-all? Should nominations be required to be "vetted" by N other people? Self-nominations only? If anyone can nominate whoever they want, what's the process of making sure those people can run/are actually interested in running?
There's also been next to no discussion around the process after nominations are collected. What's the preferred format for the community to "get to know" their prospective candidates? What logistics are going to be required to support it? etc.
It feels like (I have not actually counted) there's currently about a 50/50 split between "Only DA individual members can vote" and "Everyone with a d.o account should be able to vote." I'm not sure how such diametrically opposed opinions can be made to form consensus. So this might be a point the election committee might have to make a call on.
I probably have some others. Time for supper. :)
Maybe it's my confirmation
Maybe it's my confirmation bias, but while I read a lot of comments that said "anyone with a drupal.org account is a member of our community" or "anyone interested in Drupal is a member of community" I think most opinions on eligibility to vote ended up like "...but we should use DA membership since that is an easy to define thing that can't be as easily artificially tricked."
knaddison blog | Morris Animal Foundation