Posted by pwolanin on April 27, 2009 at 9:24pm
e.g. http://groups.drupal.org/lietuvi-kas-drupal-vertimas which seems to have few members and no content.
Should they be deleted?
e.g. http://groups.drupal.org/lietuvi-kas-drupal-vertimas which seems to have few members and no content.
Should they be deleted?
Comments
let's follow abandoned projects?
--
Growing Venture Solutions | Drupal Dashboard | Learn more about Drupal - buy a Drupal Book
knaddison blog | Morris Animal Foundation
ok, done for that one:
ok, done for that one: http://groups.drupal.org/node/21762
what about "dead groups" due to inactive group managers?
what about "dead groups" due to inactive group managers? (or managers without vision)
example: http://groups.drupal.org/orange-county
this group should be thriving.... but its not thriving on gdo... instead it has moved off-site onto www.meetup.com and http://www.ocphp.org headed by williamestrada. I know william has approached the group manager for admin rights and was turned down. which is a shame, since he's been active in coordinating meetups, and drupal training, and networking with the LA group (and possibly San Diego too). I recently had an admin create a tab that contained recent posts (which had been missing from the group for ~8 months). I imagine that will help in this particular case.
Ultimately I think there needs to be metrics in place which to gauge when a group can be "taken over" by someone else that wants to lead it or "co-lead" it. it kind of gets to the core of what is a group, and who really has rights to run it.
edit: note, forgot the word place in last paragraph.
--
mike stewart { twitter: @MediaDoneRight | IRC nick: mike stewart }
Fixed
Fixed that problem, he's now also a group admin. I'll reach out to Paris and William Estrada to ensure they are able to work together.
Kieran
Drupal community adventure guide, Acquia Inc.
Drupal events, Drupal.org redesign
great!
That's great, thanks for your help! I'm sure it will help locally - but I was really more concerned with the policies that are (or should be) in place so that decisions and changes don't seem arbitrary. I was really looking for feedback from the community and just using that as an example since I was aware of it.
--
mike stewart { twitter: @MediaDoneRight | IRC nick: mike stewart }
People should work together
We should always work towards recruiting new leaders and new people to join groups. Maybe we need to make it explicit that the groups do not belong to individuals but are tools for the entire community.
I think we also need to be more encouraging about how to grow groups by recruiting more managers, using third party tools, and reaching out to parallel groups.
Cheers,
Kieran
Drupal community adventure guide, Acquia Inc.
Drupal events, Drupal.org redesign