The Vision
- Kiwigov is a free open source Drupal 7 distribution developed specifically for New Zealand government organisations.
- Install a fully featured, New Zealand government standards compliant Drupal 7 website in under 10 minutes.
- WCAG 2.0 Level AA out of box!
The Opportunity
Drupal within New Zealand is primed for an outpouring of growth and acceptance in usage. Particularly within NZ's government sector. Imagine... Drupal as the preferred government solution in New Zealand!
The Calling
We, as a Drupal community, can learn from aGov. aGov is a Drupal 7 software distribution developed specifically for Australian government organisations.
Let's learn from aGov. Success begets success. New Zealand can be the first country in the world to adopt an existing government-specific Drupal platform and customise it the needs of our own government!
The Need
We, as Drupal individuals, can each have a part. No idea or action is too small.
Here is an eye-opening perspective: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXMnDG3QzxE
The Questions
How can we apply "How to Start a Movement" principles to Drupal NZ / Kiwigov?
How can we teach current Govt users of Drupal to share with other Govt members the benefits and joys of using Drupal?
What are your thoughts.

Comments
This is a great idea. Do you
This is a great idea. Do you think it is more of a marketing problem though? Maybe it could just be a version of aGov, that is renamed, and with a different logo to appease the NZ government, but all development could be combined with the aGov project? Then both countries governments and any other governments around the world can benefit?
govCMS
govCMS is an Australian Government initiative that started from aGov. I think NZ Gov will be watching it closely to see how it goes. The fact that both Aus and NZ are building SaaS offerings on PHP already is pretty awesome. I'd love to see NZ Gov utilise Drupal more.
I'm actually on the govCMS project - I'd be keen to chat about how NZ could utilise and collaborate with the initiatives the Australian Government has set out. The bigger issues for success in NZ are not Drupal code related but rather the infrastructure available to do it (govCMS utilises Acquia Cloud in Sydney) a government steering group to manage the direction of the project and a government internal commerce model that will work to onboard gov agencies onto the platform.
Of course, someone could try take this on privately (its kind of what CWSP did) - but its a big risk if government don't buy into it.
Watch this space
Hey everyone, and thanks Dallas for putting this up
We're in conversations right now with many other stakeholders / NZ entities at DrupalSouth regarding what the best strategy for this would be. Lots of ideas and options which we need to turn into a concise proposal of what would make sense for NZ Government. KiwiGov has been in the mix for well over a year thanks to dman / Sparks, but this past month, and especially at DrupalSouth, the momentum behind it has totally taken off. I feel certain it's going to materialise soon in some form - this bird has wings!
The strategy is still formative but it's a good time to throw around ideas and get peoples' views. The core group of Drupalists leading this from the Wellington Meetups are collaborating on putting this all together in some kind of white paper so that we can communicate the ideas clearly to government and other Drupal shops.
There are questions around hosting and meeting NZ requirements which we are working through, as well as thoughts around how to maximise the benefit for New Zealand. There are also differing views on aGov vs govCMS and NZ servers vs off-shored SaaS. We need to approach this carefully and with sensitivity, as it could have far reaching effects.
But one way or the other we're moving ahead with this initiative, and we have some very real opportunities in front of us to offer the NZ public sector an enormous amount of value and advocate the solution directly to the stakeholders. For example, there could be opportunities / forums coming up whereby we may be able to engage directly with government strategists and deliver our ideas, which I'm working on.
For now, sharing thoughts / feelings / getting reactions from NZ Drupal communities is a great thing to do. We also crucially need to build a corporate consortium of companies that would be willing to support and use a KiwiGov solution - so if you're a Drupal company owner or manager, please put up your hand to get behind this.
It seems Drupal in NZ is moving into a new and very exciting space, and it's up to all of us to have an input and help shape or influence the strategy.
I'll be keeping an eye on this thread and working with others to put together the white paper and formulate a path forwards.
www.xequals.co.nz - Kickass NZ Drupal development since 2010.
Hi Alex - please come and
Hi Alex - please come and join the aGov roadmap BoF at 3:45 today at DrupalSouth and we can discuss how we can jumpstart this for NZ.
not completely conversant in this area
The implication of:
http://www.ict.govt.nz/services/show/CWSP
"How we built a Drupal distribution for the Estonian government"
I came across an article: "How We Built a Drupal distribution for the Estonian government, PART 1 – What and Why?"
http://ardihundt.com/2014/01/26/estonian-government-drupal-distribution-...
It's certainly motivating and has some great takeaways:
"The [Estonian] Government Office did a spectacular job of bringing together all the interested parties, who, as a group, worked out the main principles and functionality of the forthcoming platform."
Who is interested in becoming part of a task force committed to KiwiGov?
Been watching with interest
Hi,
I haven't been involved in these forums for a while, but this one sparked my interest, please read below...
I'm really keen to get on board on a strategic/planning level. My role at moment is heavily involved in AWS consulting, strategy and other stuff that doesn't mean a lot of Drupal, except for providing dev ops templates/strategy for companies.
But I'm really interested in this because as an ex-govt. consultant (Drupal as well) I have seen how these politics play out. Sometimes the convincing that is needed is not at the technical level, but more so at the CIO/CX level especially when it comes to DIA, State Services etc...
What needs to be sold to the government are the benefits (many) and cost savings of Drupal with real world data to support this and it needs to be weighted against existing contracts (e.g. Silver Stripe) and services offered by other incumbents and players. Put yourself in a government customer's shoes - they are going to be evaluating and measuring the toolsets etc..
A final comment is that the design of the KiwiGov has to be done in very close consultation with government agencies, stakeholders etc... If it is done in a "bubble" then this may affect the outcome. In addition to this, Silverstripe's current contract for all of government is up for 2 year renewal next year so
And all in all. Drupal is the best CMS in the market so there is no reason why it can't become the preferred platform for government in the future.
I'd suggest if we have some people serious about this then get a pool of Drupal vendor representatives together with not the goal of selling their "own" solution, but with the goal of "collaborating" together with their strengths... about 6 people in total is a good start. I'd be happy to facilitate and be involved as someone with virtually no vendor interest, but definitely the industry interest.
cheers,
Ben
I hadn't thought about this
I hadn't thought about this previously, but if you are making a case for why Drupal should be 'on the list' then the fact that Drupal can be integrated with a fully featured CRM (civicrm) may well be a factor.
I don't know how well SilverStripe does this - I see some resources being talked about here - http://www.silverstripe.org/blog/making-a-crm-with-modeladmin-in-silvers...
whatever the outcome of these discussions, i would be happy to contribute information about what Civi can add to Drupal (and vv) as well as provide examples (eg the New York State Senate) of suitable organisations using CiviCRM.
pete davis : fuzion : connect + campaign + communicate
@dreambubbler, @kiwifellows
@dreambubbler, @kiwifellows and others..
Guys, it sounds like you've not been informed of the rest of the story until now. It's great to see you getting excited about it, and we'll be happy to let you know more in the near future - Alex is probably taking names to register this second wave of interest right now.
... there is much more to the product offering, and many many more important factors I'd like to discuss in time. There are also a number of take-aways we are making from things learned from this weeks aGov presentation both technical and strategic that I'm hoping to assimilate.
Alex or I will be happy to invite you to the next upcoming strategy session for the team - upcoming date TBD AFIK, but it looks like it will be sooner rather than later.
.dan.
@dreambubbler, @dman and crew
Hi, I got really excited :)
Good work you guys have been doing.
cheers,
Ben
We spoke about possibilities
We spoke about possibilities of a KiwiGov distribution taking hints from the Australian govCMS distribution both in terms of code included and governance model at DrupalSouth in Melbourne last week.
As another member of the govCMS team, I'm really interested in helping in some way to bring Drupal on public cloud into New Zealand for the government there.
Hi everyone - just a heads up
Hi everyone - just a heads up that you'll have full support to use aGov as the basis for kiwiGov. The model used by govCMS is relatively easy to replicate, in that we can create a specific branch and then share features up and down stream into specific versions. @kimb0oo is your best contact to discuss specifics.
Thanks for the clear
Thanks for the clear endorsement Owen.
I've taken away a number of ideas re automated builds, managing patches, and subclassing distributions, that give us a clear way to get the best of all worlds WRT re-use, and WRT contributing back upstream where commonality is found.
The synergy that has been apparent so far in the contrib module selection, and the way the aGov+govCMS testing has been able to test and push those modules to breaking point and create better upstream patches is the sort of thing I envisage for our participation also.
My current task is making those processes (automated build/tag/release etc) as frictionless as possible for our contribution team from the different agencies who all use different workflows, and try to keep it cohesive.