Anyone know of a good counter-article Chris Wilson's ignorant Slate article?

Events happening in the community are now at Drupal community events on www.drupal.org.
rainbreaw's picture

In case you didn't catch it, on Oct. 27 Chris Wilson posted a very ignorant article on Slate criticizing the Obama administration's choice of Drupal for whitehouse.gov (the title is "Why running the White House Web site on Drupal is a political disaster waiting to happen" - but I won't be linking to it here, it doesn't deserve a link). Anyone who knows Drupal will read the article and feel that he's just making stuff up. The article is a big "huh?!" His comments have no correlation to an actual experience with Drupal and the Drupal community!

That said, unfortunately there are non-technical decision makers in the world who are reading the article and telling their web developers to stop using Drupal immediately. This happened to a friend of mine recently. They aren't really to blame - if you don't know anything about Drupal, the article might sound well thought out.

I want to help my friend out: does anyone know of good counter-articles to this post? I've seen plenty of great counter-discussions that are geared towards those of us who use Drupal, so that's not what I'm looking for. I'm looking for articles, published in a reputable environments that non-technical decision makers will recognize, and that non-technical people will understand.

The only one I know of at the moment is a really good one from Conor McNamara:
http://www.databasepublish.com/blog/messengers-errors-chris-wilsons-flaw...

Please post any others that are out there?

Comments

InformationWeek published a

christefano's picture

InformationWeek published a response, WhiteHouse.gov Drupal Detractors Get Buggy.

This came up in the Boston group, too: http://groups.drupal.org/node/32766

that's a good one

rainbreaw's picture

Thank you for linking to it, and to the Boston group's discussion!

Tim O'Reilly's article is a